India External

Photo Source:
   NIAS Course on Global Politics
National Institute of Advanced Studies (NIAS)
Indian Institute of Science Campus, Bangalore
For any further information or to subscribe to GP alerts send an email to subachandran@nias.res.in

India External
Modi's Foreign Policy 2.0: A Response to C Raja Mohan

  Sourina Bej

C Raja Mohan in his recent commentary ("In his second term, Modi must deal with turbulence unleashed by Trump’s challenge to global trading order," The Indian Express, 25 May 2019 )  has emphasised on the need for India to understand the geo-economic shifts unleashed by US President Donald Trump on the global trading order. Identifying the foreign policy challenges for Modi in his second term, Raja Mohan also points out that even though Modi has not altered the essential foreign policy tenets built by his predecessors, he had infused ‘bold’ energy in the establishment.

Research Associate, ISSSP, National Institute of Advanced Studies, Indian Institute of Science campus

The current challenges to India’s foreign policy are not the same confounding the leadership in 2014. Voted back to power, Prime Minister Narendra Modi will have to face several global instabilities that have become prominent over the past two years. US’s not-so-steady policy in West Asia, pulling the plug on the JCPOA and renewed tension with Iran has put many oil importing countries, especially India and China in a fix. The escalating US-China trade war has forced nations dependent on US and Chinese market to look for larger options to evade the consequences of the tech and tariff.  The conclusion of the two-sessions meeting and the Belt and Road Initiative Forum in Beijing has led to a further institutionalisation of the BRI idea. The Brexit and the simultaneous exit of the UK PM Theresa May have kept the European politics fractured and lastly, the transitions in the coalition building had earlier reached new ground with the idea of the Indo-Pacific but with great power politics, this alliance-building could see a major shift.  

Reiterating the same, C Raja Mohan in his recent commentary ("In his second term, Modi must deal with turbulence unleashed by Trump’s challenge to global trading order," The Indian Express, 25 May 2019 )  has emphasised on the need for India to understand the geo-economic shifts unleashed by US President Donald Trump on the global trading order. Identifying the foreign policy challenges for Modi in his second term, Raja Mohan also points out that even though Modi has not altered the essential foreign policy tenets built by his predecessors, he had infused ‘bold’ energy in the establishment. Modi has readily taken decisions in responding to India’s relation with the US, Pakistan and China. The author points out Modi’s policies in ending India’s “historic hesitations” towards the US, confronting the sources of terrorism in Pakistan and readily staring down at China in the military stand-off in Doklam has been few achievements. But the international environment is more dynamic now than before and the most important change is the change in the global economic order which is accompanied by the structural changes in the global power relations.

India has invested in coalition building by working in institutions like Quad, International Solar Alliance but all are not adept to deal with the challenges emerging in the geo-economic front. Since 1990 the course of the Washington consensus has been heavily reversed by Trump, thus protecting India's trade equities against US trade targets is a priority. Raja Mohan sees India's foreign policy taking a hard and closer strategising of its stake in the global foreign trade.  

Quite rightly so, the stakes in the geo-economic front has been up the ante for India.

But taking a closer look at Modi’s tenure one could find that the incapacity of the UPA government to take quick decisions without a shroud of apprehension quite rightly made Modi’s approach to the foreign policy bold. Was Modi’s approach really bold? It is without a question that Modi has strengthened the U.S.-India relationship starting with inviting Obama as the chief guest for the Republic Day. He has without hesitation worked with great powers simultaneously. With the Foreign Secretary Vijay Gokhale's speech in 2019 Raisina Dialogue, it was clear that India is looking to move on from its non-aligned past and that was possible with Modi’s personal charm with the leaders. But the alignment has come in terms of issue and the non-alignment has remained with the individual countries. Thus when India worked with the US, Japan, Australia on the Quad, it also chose to break the anti-China rhetoric through the Wuhan summit. Modi has continued in its practice of balancing between the US and China whether bilaterally or through multilateral engagements. That is here to stay.

Secondly, in terms of its policy with China, it met with little success in spite of the Wuhan summit, as the spirit is yet to be back channelled into something concrete in the trade relations. In addition, most of his policies in the Southeast and East Asian countries have had its roots in the tenures of Narasimha Rao, Vajpayee and Manmohan Singh. It is with the Pulwama attack that he is seen to have taken a bold and hard-handed approach to foreign policy. Simultaneously he has also been criticised that Pulwama was more an act to show the home audience of his capacities as a leader before the election than a message to Pakistan. What Modi followed was given by policy and some were a set of reactions to the existing situations. With the current geopolitics shifting at a faster rate sticking to this responsive path might be a challenge for Modi.

Thirdly, despite the great energy, the payoff has been limited in the neighbourhood. In Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka and the Maldives, minus exports, India’s clout has always been dependent on which government is in power rather than on its own economic deep pockets and capacities. That will not change until Modi brings in major reforms to rejig the fast pace work of the bureaucracy.  

Lastly, Trump’s policies have not just upturned the geo-economic but have an overlapping impact in the geo polity. The area of Modi’s foreign relations that are seen the most success is with West Asia. In the Middle East, India has asserted itself like never before, even garnering an invite to the inaugural address the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) for the first time in its 50 years of existence. No other country could successfully maintain a relationship with Israel, Palestine and the Arab world in one balance than India. It has successfully gone ahead with the construction of a port in Chabahar, Iran connecting to Afghanistan by land and sea. By with tensions tearing between Washington and Tehran, New Delhi is now walking the tight rope to take a decision on importing Iranian oil. India’s close association with the US has now made it impossible to make an independent decision on oil imports. India has also previously stopped importing oil from Venezuela upon US pressure.

Geoeconomic has become the heart of geopolitical shifts in the contemporary world. The challenge for India would be to find a way to firm up its negotiating structures that would reset the economic path along with the geopolitical path instead of dealing with the challenges separately.

 

Print Bookmark

PREVIOUS COMMENTS

March 2024 | CWA # 1251

NIAS Africa Team

Africa This Week
February 2024 | CWA # 1226

NIAS Africa Team

Africa This Week
December 2023 | CWA # 1189

Hoimi Mukherjee | Hoimi Mukherjee is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Political Science in Bankura Zilla Saradamani Mahila Mahavidyapith.

Chile in 2023: Crises of Constitutionality
December 2023 | CWA # 1187

Aprajita Kashyap | Aprajita Kashyap is a faculty of Latin American Studies, School of International Studies at the Jawaharlal Nehru University New Delhi.

Haiti in 2023: The Humanitarian Crisis
December 2023 | CWA # 1185

Binod Khanal | Binod Khanal is a Doctoral candidate at the Centre for European Studies, School of International Studies, JNU, New Delhi.

The Baltic: Energy, Russia, NATO and China
December 2023 | CWA # 1183

Padmashree Anandhan | Padmashree Anandhan is a Research Associate at the School of Conflict and Security Studies, National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bangaluru.

Germany in 2023: Defence, Economy and Energy Triangle
December 2023 | CWA # 1178

​​​​​​​Ashok Alex Luke | Ashok Alex Luke is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Political Science at CMS College, Kottayam.

China and South Asia in 2023: Advantage Beijing?
December 2023 | CWA # 1177

Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri | Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri is a postgraduate student at the Department of Defence and Strategic Studies at the University of Madras, Chennai.

China and East Asia
October 2023 | CWA # 1091

Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri

Issues for Europe
July 2023 | CWA # 1012

Bibhu Prasad Routray

Myanmar continues to burn
December 2022 | CWA # 879

Padmashree Anandhan

The Ukraine War
November 2022 | CWA # 838

Rishma Banerjee

Tracing Europe's droughts
March 2022 | CWA # 705

NIAS Africa Team

In Focus: Libya
December 2021 | CWA # 630

GP Team

Europe in 2021
October 2021 | CWA # 588

Abigail Miriam Fernandez

TLP is back again
August 2021 | CWA # 528

STIR Team

Space Tourism
September 2019 | CWA # 162

Lakshman Chakravarthy N

5G: A Primer
December 2018 | CWA # 71

Mahesh Bhatta | Centre for South Asian Studies, Kathmandu

Nepal
December 2018 | CWA # 70

Nasima Khatoon | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

The Maldives
December 2018 | CWA # 69

Harini Madhusudan | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

India
December 2018 | CWA # 68

Sourina Bej | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

Bangladesh
December 2018 | CWA # 67

Seetha Lakshmi Dinesh Iyer | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

Afghanistan