The FATF Meeting, February 2020

Photo Source: Dawn
   NIAS Course on Global Politics
National Institute of Advanced Studies (NIAS)
Indian Institute of Science Campus, Bangalore
For any further information or to subscribe to GP alerts send an email to subachandran@nias.res.in

The FATF Meeting, February 2020
Pakistan to remain “Grey”; North Korea and Iran in “Black”

  Lakshmi V Menon

Consequences of being grey-listed are significant for the reprimanded countries. First, economic sanctions and difficulties in availing loans from World Bank, ADB, IMF and other countries.

The Financial Action Task Force Plenary meet was held in Paris to discuss global terror funding and money laundering issues from February 16-21 2020. As reported by the FATF website, about 800 representatives from 205 countries, the World Bank, IMF, UN and other organizations took part in the plenary meeting. Progresses by nations that FATF claim “present a risk to the financial system” such as Pakistan, Iran and others were debated and deliberated.

On the final day, 21 February, the Plenary concluded that Pakistan will continue for another four months in the “grey-list” (or “Other Monitored Jurisdictions” list) with a severe reprimand of being “black-listed” on failure of completion of the FATF recommended 27-points by June 2020; while North Korea and Iran would continue in the “black-list” (or listed as "Non-Cooperative Countries or Territories" or “High Risk Jurisdictions Subject to a Call for Action”). Countermeasures against Tehran and North Korea were reinstated after they were noted to have failed the Action Plan. 

The Plenary commended South Korea on a sound institutional and legal framework. After a consistency and quality review, Korea and UAE mutual evaluation reports would be published in April 2020, it added. FATF commented that UAE had strengthened countering financing of terrorism (CFT) and anti-money laundering (AML) measures, but needed to improve international cooperation, prosecutions and investigations; Korea had to enhance supervision by focusing on misuse of legal structures; and agreed upon Re-rating of US (based on degree of technical compliance) after a discussion on the US’ 2016 mutual evaluation’s follow-up report. 

FATF, a global money-laundering and terror funding watchdog, is an inter-governmental decision-making body that was established in 1989, during the G7 Paris summit, to develop policies for combating terror-financing, money laundering and associated threats. The policy-making body strives to generate political will for national regulatory and legislative reforms. First, FATF provides benchmarks and endorses effective realization of regulatory, legal and operational processes for AML/CFT. Second, the body identifies national and regional level vulnerabilities, aiming to preserve the veracity of international financial systems. While “black-listed” states support money laundering and terror funding activities, those states that are considered safe-havens for such perpetrators face being “grey-listed”, as a warning. The listings are subject to regular revision through addition or deletion of entries by the FATF; in 2019, Sri Lanka, Ethiopia and Tunisia were dropped from monitoring. In February 2020, Albania, Barbados, Jamaica, Mauritius, Myanmar, Nicaragua and Uganda were added to the “grey-list”.

Post 9/11 attacks, the watchdog’s prominence in combatting terror-funding amplified. As of 2019, “grey list” included 12 countries – Bahamas, Botswana, Cambodia, Ghana, Iceland, Mongolia, Panama, Pakistan, Trinidad and Tobago, Yemen and Zimbabwe; and the “blacklist” included North Korea and Iran. Presently, it has 39 members including regional blocs such as the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) and the European Commission.

Previously, the watchdog had given Islamabad a September 2019 deadline for curbing terror funding to terrorist organizations and leadership designated by UN Security Council. In November 2019, noting Pakistan’s compliance with merely four points, the deadline was postponed to February 2020. At the International Co-operation Review Group’s (ICRG) Paris meeting, Pakistan presented a report on actions appropriated by the state to check terror-sponsoring. The watchdog’s extension, ICRG, warned that Pakistan would face being “black-listed” in case of non-compliance with the outstanding 22 out of 27 FATF requirements. Pakistan was also grey-listed from 2012-2015. The incongruence of Islamabad’s national anti-terror laws with UNSC resolution 2464 (criminalizing terror financing) and FATF standards have led to the country repeatedly finding itself in the grey-list. While FATF seeks a complete denial of weapons access, travel ban and freezing of funds, Pakistan simply detained Masood Azhar and Hafiz Saeed. The LeT, JeM, JuD cadres’ arrests were also under the Maintenance of Public Order Act and not under the 1997 Anti-Terrorism Act. In the February 2020 meeting, despite heavy lobbying, Pakistan could only garner support from China, Turkey and Malaysia and thus failed to secure the 12 out of 39 votes required to exit the grey-list (only three votes were required to avoid the black-list). India has persistently provided evidence on Pakistan’s inaction.

In 2016, FATF welcomed Iran’s commitment to tackle terror-financing and money-laundering after Tehran’s decision to outsource technical assistance to implement the FATF directive, the establishment of a cash-declaration regime, and amendments enacted for CFT regime and AML acts. However, in February 2020, although FATF recognized Tehran’s labours for progress, it judged non-compliance with various requirements. However, Abdolnasser Hemmati, Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, dismissed the listing claiming it inept of hindering “Iran’s foreign trade or stability in currency rates”.

According to the FATF directive, Pakistan, Iran and North Korea need to totally revamp their financial networks for enhancing monitoring of transaction patterns and business relationships, cracking down on terror outfits, curbing terror-sponsoring and fortifying CFT and AML. For Tehran, countermeasures may be suspended provided Iran ratifies the Palermo and Terrorist Financing Conventions. North Korea has time and again ignored the warnings.

Consequences of being grey-listed are significant for the reprimanded countries. First, economic sanctions and difficulties in availing loans from World Bank, ADB, IMF and other countries. Second, a reduction in international trade. Lastly, a global boycott that may brew politico-socio-economic issues posing administrative challenges. The latest verdicts will further strain the struggling economies and polities of Pakistan, Iran and North Korea. States often paint a political conundrum on verdicts leading to stringent sanctions. To reduce such risks and enhance efficiency, FATF urges member states to independently appropriate countermeasures. Nevertheless, Iran’s blacklisting could be a pawn in the ongoing US-Iran conflict. FATF’s decision will enable the US to further arm-twist Iran and justify the crippling sanctions.

Additionally, FATF highlighted vital initiatives like those using novel standards for virtual currencies, digital identity systems, and provided methods to tackle illegal wildlife trade. The body also offered a set of possible countermeasures in the form of an ‘Interpretative Note to Recommendation 19’.

Print Bookmark

PREVIOUS COMMENTS

March 2024 | CWA # 1251

NIAS Africa Team

Africa This Week
February 2024 | CWA # 1226

NIAS Africa Team

Africa This Week
December 2023 | CWA # 1189

Hoimi Mukherjee | Hoimi Mukherjee is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Political Science in Bankura Zilla Saradamani Mahila Mahavidyapith.

Chile in 2023: Crises of Constitutionality
December 2023 | CWA # 1187

Aprajita Kashyap | Aprajita Kashyap is a faculty of Latin American Studies, School of International Studies at the Jawaharlal Nehru University New Delhi.

Haiti in 2023: The Humanitarian Crisis
December 2023 | CWA # 1185

Binod Khanal | Binod Khanal is a Doctoral candidate at the Centre for European Studies, School of International Studies, JNU, New Delhi.

The Baltic: Energy, Russia, NATO and China
December 2023 | CWA # 1183

Padmashree Anandhan | Padmashree Anandhan is a Research Associate at the School of Conflict and Security Studies, National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bangaluru.

Germany in 2023: Defence, Economy and Energy Triangle
December 2023 | CWA # 1178

​​​​​​​Ashok Alex Luke | Ashok Alex Luke is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Political Science at CMS College, Kottayam.

China and South Asia in 2023: Advantage Beijing?
December 2023 | CWA # 1177

Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri | Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri is a postgraduate student at the Department of Defence and Strategic Studies at the University of Madras, Chennai.

China and East Asia
October 2023 | CWA # 1091

Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri

Issues for Europe
July 2023 | CWA # 1012

Bibhu Prasad Routray

Myanmar continues to burn
December 2022 | CWA # 879

Padmashree Anandhan

The Ukraine War
November 2022 | CWA # 838

Rishma Banerjee

Tracing Europe's droughts
March 2022 | CWA # 705

NIAS Africa Team

In Focus: Libya
December 2021 | CWA # 630

GP Team

Europe in 2021
October 2021 | CWA # 588

Abigail Miriam Fernandez

TLP is back again
August 2021 | CWA # 528

STIR Team

Space Tourism
September 2019 | CWA # 162

Lakshman Chakravarthy N

5G: A Primer
December 2018 | CWA # 71

Mahesh Bhatta | Centre for South Asian Studies, Kathmandu

Nepal
December 2018 | CWA # 70

Nasima Khatoon | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

The Maldives
December 2018 | CWA # 69

Harini Madhusudan | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

India
December 2018 | CWA # 68

Sourina Bej | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

Bangladesh
December 2018 | CWA # 67

Seetha Lakshmi Dinesh Iyer | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

Afghanistan