Middle East

Photo Source: Al Jazeera
   NIAS Course on Global Politics
National Institute of Advanced Studies (NIAS)
Indian Institute of Science Campus, Bangalore
For any further information or to subscribe to GP alerts send an email to subachandran@nias.res.in

Middle East
Iran, US and the Nuclear Deal: Will Russia remain neutral?

  Mahath Mangal

If the conflict escalates, Russia might not remain neutral as an increased US presence in the Middle East would undermine the influence and role as a balancer in the region. This does not mean Russia would engage the US directly in an offensive capacity

Recently, the Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov made a statement asking the US not to cause ‘military provocation’ in the Middle East. He said that Moscow had called on both the US and Iran to show restraint. 

The tension in the Gulf has been ongoing and been escalated by the US increasing its military presence, recently sending an additional 1000 personnel to the already stationed 1500.
According to Moscow, the US is adding fuel to the fire it started by withdrawing from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action(JCPOA)last year. The cascading effects have taken the relations between the superpower and Iran-a regional power to where they are today. The stakes are high with the conflict looming and Russia being a close partner of Iran raises the question of whether Moscow would maintain neutrality in the event of further escalation.

Russia, Iran and the Middle East

Russia and Iran share a close relationship in the region. In response to NATO, the Russia-led Collective Security Organization invited Iran to be a member. To limit the influence of the US in the central Asian region, Russia saw Iran as an essential ally in all probability. Iran is much ahead of its neighbours in the region in weapon development and innovation. While they use primarily American-made weaponry, Iran’s arsenal became increasingly Russian made. The cooperation in this field extended both ways. While Moscow supplied weapons systems, Tehran instead of being a mere receiver, returned the favour by providing drone technology. Russia and Iran had signed a defence deal in 2010 where Moscow was to supply Tehran with its S-300, armoured vehicles, helicopters and ships which was called off following Iran coming under fire from the United Nations for refusing to halt its Uranium enrichment programme- leading to a sour relation between the countries for a while. It was not long before the two countries found common ground.

During the Syrian civil war, Iran and Russia took joint efforts in providing armed support to curb the rebellion in Syria’s North-West. This had resulted in Russia being put under sanctions from the west, citing war crimes on civilians under the pretence of supporting the Syrian government. 

The relations also extend in trade. The Eurasian Economic Union of which Russia is the prime member invited Iran to be a member though Iran shares its border with only one EEU member country-  Armenia. Today, Iran is a ’key partner’ of EEU in the Middle East, signing a Free Trade Agreement with the economic union. While in 2005, the trade between Russia and Iran was only $1 billion, it jumped to $3.7 billion in three years. The massive energy deal between the countries in 2015 was worth $20 billion. These increasing avenues of cooperation were an effect of a shared characteristic of being under the US imposed sanctions and international response to their ‘rogue activities’. 

Thus, Iran’s ties with Russia had room for improvement since Tehran came under sanctions from the US following its withdrawal from JCPOA. The sanctions were intended to pressurise Iran to negotiate a better deal as Trump was unsatisfied with the terms of the agreement. This has had the collateral effect of bringing Tehran closer to Moscow- Washington’s long-time rival.

Will Russia remain neutral?
Russia faces sanctions from the West following the Ukrainian crisis and the subsequent annexation of Crimea. This proved to be a common ground for closer Moscow-Tehran ties. Putin approved the sale of S-300 air defence systems and other weaponry in 2015. 

If the conflict escalates, Russia might not remain neutral as an increased US presence in the Middle East would undermine the influence and role as a balancer in the region. This does not mean Russia would engage the US directly in an offensive capacity. Moscow might at best help Iran fortify its defence systems by upgrading the existing s-300 systems with the latest S-400 Triumf. 
A direct conflict would not be in anybody’s best interest. The international community is caught between the stubborn US and a seemingly loose Iran, with economic interests at stake. The other member states of the JCPOA and even Japan are all trying to de-escalate the situation. Russia, cannot remain neutral if it has to maintain its trajectory to reclaim its superpower status in reality.

Print Bookmark

PREVIOUS COMMENTS

March 2024 | CWA # 1251

NIAS Africa Team

Africa This Week
February 2024 | CWA # 1226

NIAS Africa Team

Africa This Week
December 2023 | CWA # 1189

Hoimi Mukherjee | Hoimi Mukherjee is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Political Science in Bankura Zilla Saradamani Mahila Mahavidyapith.

Chile in 2023: Crises of Constitutionality
December 2023 | CWA # 1187

Aprajita Kashyap | Aprajita Kashyap is a faculty of Latin American Studies, School of International Studies at the Jawaharlal Nehru University New Delhi.

Haiti in 2023: The Humanitarian Crisis
December 2023 | CWA # 1185

Binod Khanal | Binod Khanal is a Doctoral candidate at the Centre for European Studies, School of International Studies, JNU, New Delhi.

The Baltic: Energy, Russia, NATO and China
December 2023 | CWA # 1183

Padmashree Anandhan | Padmashree Anandhan is a Research Associate at the School of Conflict and Security Studies, National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bangaluru.

Germany in 2023: Defence, Economy and Energy Triangle
December 2023 | CWA # 1178

​​​​​​​Ashok Alex Luke | Ashok Alex Luke is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Political Science at CMS College, Kottayam.

China and South Asia in 2023: Advantage Beijing?
December 2023 | CWA # 1177

Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri | Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri is a postgraduate student at the Department of Defence and Strategic Studies at the University of Madras, Chennai.

China and East Asia
October 2023 | CWA # 1091

Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri

Issues for Europe
July 2023 | CWA # 1012

Bibhu Prasad Routray

Myanmar continues to burn
December 2022 | CWA # 879

Padmashree Anandhan

The Ukraine War
November 2022 | CWA # 838

Rishma Banerjee

Tracing Europe's droughts
March 2022 | CWA # 705

NIAS Africa Team

In Focus: Libya
December 2021 | CWA # 630

GP Team

Europe in 2021
October 2021 | CWA # 588

Abigail Miriam Fernandez

TLP is back again
August 2021 | CWA # 528

STIR Team

Space Tourism
September 2019 | CWA # 162

Lakshman Chakravarthy N

5G: A Primer
December 2018 | CWA # 71

Mahesh Bhatta | Centre for South Asian Studies, Kathmandu

Nepal
December 2018 | CWA # 70

Nasima Khatoon | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

The Maldives
December 2018 | CWA # 69

Harini Madhusudan | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

India
December 2018 | CWA # 68

Sourina Bej | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

Bangladesh
December 2018 | CWA # 67

Seetha Lakshmi Dinesh Iyer | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

Afghanistan