TWTW Note

CWA # 1666
TWTW Note
The US-Ukraine
The mineral deal with the US
The World This Week #308 &309 Vol 7 Nos 17 &18, 04 May 2025

Padmashree Anandhan
4 May 2025

Photo Source: US Department of the Treasury/Reuters

The following note was first published as a part of The World This Week #308 &309 Vol 7 Nos 17 &18, 04 May 2025

What happened? 
On 30 April, the US Treasury Secretary and Ukraine’s Economy Minister signed the critical minerals deal. According to Reuters, the deal includes the creation of the joint fund, in which Ukraine would receive half the profits. The agreement also includes providing the US with preferential access to any new Ukraine resources deal, but there will be no direct control over Ukraine’s minerals and natural resources.

On 01 May, Senior Russian security official Dmitry Medvedev said: “Trump has broken the Kyiv regime to the point where they will have to pay for U.S. aid with mineral resources.” "Now they (Ukrainians) will have to pay for military supplies with the national wealth of a disappearing country."

On 01 May, Ukraine’s President Zelenskyy announced finalising of minerals agreement with the US as a “historic” and significantly improved deal. He described it as an “equal partnership” to invite major investments, industrial modernization, and legal reforms in Ukraine. 

The US-Ukraine agreement establishes a jointly managed Reconstruction Investment Fund to plough future incomes from Ukraine’s natural resources—such as critical minerals, oil, and gas—into post-war recovery and economic growth. Under a revenue-sharing model, Ukraine will contribute 50 per cent of net earnings from new resource projects, while present resource revenues are expected to protect current industries. The US pledges long-term financial support to Ukraine’s economy. However, the deal excludes explicit security guarantees, a concern for Ukraine given its anticipations for tougher assurances in exchange for giving resource access.

What is the background? 
First, Ukraine’s minerals and its significance. Ukraine holds vast unexploited reserves of critical minerals including graphite, titanium and lithium. The US need them for developing its renewable energy, military technology, and infrastructure. They are essential for electric vehicle batteries, semiconductors, and military technologies. Ukraine holds about 20 per cent of global reserves. While most of these resources continue to be undeveloped and rare earth mining is not yet commercially operative, their strategic worth has grown amidst global supply chain worries and efforts to lessen dependency on China’s mineral supremacy. 

Second, Trump’s push for the deal. His interest in a deal with Ukraine emerges from the need to secure access to Ukraine's unexploited critical minerals. Thereby, through collaboration, Trump can decrease US dependency on China for strategic resources, aligning with his economic agenda and “America First” policy. 

Third, the difficult road to the deal. During October 2024 to April 2025, several high-level meetings were held between the US and Ukraine to finalise the framework of the deal. The negotiations began in the US in October 2024 where Ukraine’s ministers of energy and economy met with members of  Trump’s foreign policy advisory team. A working group session in Kyiv in December 2024 was convened, discussing the resource valuations, revenue-sharing terms, and the structure of the proposed Reconstruction Investment Fund. In January, Zelenskyy and Trump met in private in Geneva during a regional security conference, which served as a key moment in aligning political intentions with economic terms. Throughout February and early March, additional technical negotiations were held to draft legal frameworks and simplify the omission of existing resource revenues. The rebuttal in the Oval Office between Trump and Zelenskyy stalled the talks. The final meeting held in April 2025 at the Vatican, where Trump and Zelenskyy met and aimed at settling existing disagreements, especially for security guarantees and governance of the investment fund.

What does it mean? 
First, the deal assures Ukraine’s long-term reconstruction effort and economic stability. The signing of the deal marks a shift in the US’s approach to prioritize Ukraine’s economic recovery over military aid. Although the deal lacks a clear security guarantee, it is a step away from defence support. This would weaken Ukraine's position in the negotiation for peace and boost Russia’s position for its continued resistance against the West’s military. However, Ukraine’s vast mineral wealth to US investment, the deal would be a deterrent, aiding Ukraine’s economic future.

Second, potential geopolitical tension. The US presence in Ukraine through this deal increases the US influence, positioning it as a key partner in Ukraine's recovery and resource development. While direct military engagement in avoided, it provides a strategic grip in Eastern Europe, opposing Russian aggression and restraining European dominance in Ukraine’s reconstruction. Therefore, such increased economic engagement could heighten tensions with Russia, which may perceive it as further US intrusion, intensifying the geopolitical divide.
 

About the author 
Padmashree Anandhan is Project Associate at NIAS

PREVIOUS COMMENTS

February 2026 | CWA # 1959

Yesasvi Koganti | Yesasvi Koganti is an undergraduate student from Madras Christian College, Chennai.

UK and China
February 2026 | CWA # 1957

R Preetha | R Preetha is pursuing post-graduation in the Department of International Studies, Stella Maris College, Chennai, and is a Research Assistant at the National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru.

The India–US interim trade framework
February 2026 | CWA # 1956

Lekshmi MK | Lekshmi MK is pursuing post-graduation in the Department of Political Science, Madras Christian College, Chennai, and is a Research Assistant at the National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru.

End of the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START)
State of Global Politics 2025
December 2025 | CWA # 1931

Padmashree Anandhan

NATO Summit 2025
State of Global Politics 2025
December 2025 | CWA # 1924

Padmashree Anandhan

NATO Summit 2025
This Week in History
August 2025 | CWA # 1801

R Preetha

28 August 1963
TWTW note
August 2025 | CWA # 1780

Abhiruchi Chowdhury

Trump tariffs:
This Week in History
August 2025 | CWA # 1778

Lekshmi MK

28 July 1914
TWTW Note
June 2025 | CWA # 1694

Aashish Ganeshan

The US:
CW Note
May 2025 | CWA # 1689

Padmashree Anandhan

Ukraine
CW Note
May 2025 | CWA # 1688

Ayan Datta

Gaza
CW Note
May 2025 | CWA # 1675

Lekshmi MK

Turkey:
CW Note
May 2025 | CWA # 1673

Padmashree Anandhan

Ukraine:
TWTW Note
May 2025 | CWA # 1667

R Preetha and Brighty Ann Sarah

East Asia:
NIAS Global Politics Database
March 2024 | CWA # 1251

NIAS Africa Team

Africa This Week
NIAS Global Politics Database
February 2024 | CWA # 1226

NIAS Africa Team

Africa This Week
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1189

Hoimi Mukherjee | Hoimi Mukherjee is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Political Science in Bankura Zilla Saradamani Mahila Mahavidyapith.

Chile in 2023: Crises of Constitutionality
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1187

Aprajita Kashyap | Aprajita Kashyap is a faculty of Latin American Studies, School of International Studies at the Jawaharlal Nehru University New Delhi.

Haiti in 2023: The Humanitarian Crisis
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1185

Binod Khanal | Binod Khanal is a Doctoral candidate at the Centre for European Studies, School of International Studies, JNU, New Delhi.

The Baltic: Energy, Russia, NATO and China
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1183

Padmashree Anandhan | Padmashree Anandhan is a Research Associate at the School of Conflict and Security Studies, National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bangaluru.

Germany in 2023: Defence, Economy and Energy Triangle
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1178

​​​​​​​Ashok Alex Luke | Ashok Alex Luke is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Political Science at CMS College, Kottayam.

China and South Asia in 2023: Advantage Beijing?
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1177

Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri | Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri is a postgraduate student at the Department of Defence and Strategic Studies at the University of Madras, Chennai.

China and East Asia
The War in Ukraine
October 2023 | CWA # 1091

Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri

Issues for Europe
IPRI Quarterly Forecasts I Triggers, Trends, and Trajectories
July 2023 | CWA # 1012

Bibhu Prasad Routray

Myanmar continues to burn
2022: The World This Year
December 2022 | CWA # 879

Padmashree Anandhan

The Ukraine War
Europe: Heatwaves, Wildfires, Droughts, and Ice Melt in Alps
November 2022 | CWA # 838

Rishma Banerjee

Tracing Europe's droughts
NIAS Africa Weekly
March 2022 | CWA # 705

NIAS Africa Team

In Focus: Libya
The World This Week: 150th Issue
December 2021 | CWA # 630

GP Team

Europe in 2021
Pakistan Reader
October 2021 | CWA # 588

Abigail Miriam Fernandez

TLP is back again
NIAS Fortnightly on Science, Technology & International Relations
August 2021 | CWA # 528

STIR Team

Space Tourism
Science, Technology and International Relations
September 2019 | CWA # 162

Lakshman Chakravarthy N

5G: A Primer
South Asia Monthly Brief (Nov 2018)
December 2018 | CWA # 71

Mahesh Bhatta | Centre for South Asian Studies, Kathmandu

Nepal
South Asia Monthly Brief (Nov 2018)
December 2018 | CWA # 70

Nasima Khatoon | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

The Maldives
South Asia Monthly Brief (Nov 2018)
December 2018 | CWA # 69

Harini Madhusudan | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

India
South Asia Monthly Brief (Nov 2018)
December 2018 | CWA # 68

Sourina Bej | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

Bangladesh
South Asia Monthly Brief (Nov 2018)
December 2018 | CWA # 67

Seetha Lakshmi Dinesh Iyer | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

Afghanistan