CWA Commentary

Photo Source: www.rfa.org
   NIAS Course on Global Politics
National Institute of Advanced Studies (NIAS)
Indian Institute of Science Campus, Bangalore
For any further information or to subscribe to GP alerts send an email to subachandran@nias.res.in
Print Bookmark

CWA # 171, 12 October 2019

Myanmar
Will prosecuting Suu Kyi resolve the Rohingya problem?

  Aparupa Bhattacherjee

Prosecuting Suu Kyi cannot be a solution. She may be just an easy target. Also, punishing Suu Kyi will not pull down Myanmar: rather, it would consider as an unjust step taken for people who do not belong to their country. It will deteriorate the situation rather than helping the Rohingyas. 

The military and civil society in Myanmar are also equally responsible for the Rohingya crisis in Myanmar.

Aparupa Bhattacherjee is a PhD scholar at the International Strategic and Security Studies Programme at NIAS.

In September 2019, the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on Myanmar called for the prosecution of Aung San Suu Kyi. The panel's report 'Detailed findings of the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on Myanmar', was submitted to the Human Rights Council. This report elaborates on the atrocities of the army on Rohingya and other minorities. 

The Chairman of the fact-finding mission stated that the Myanmar army has been continuing its "policies and practices" against the Rohingya community since 2017. He mentioned "Impunity continues. Discrimination continues. Hate speech continues. Persecution continues." Hence the panel recommended the prosecution of Suu Kyi for her in-action. 

Should Aung San Suu Kyi be prosecuted? Will her prosecution resolve the problem?

Should Suu Kyi be prosecuted?

Though the Arakan army and Tatmadaw are the perpetrators of the crime, the report states, Suu Kyi could have controlled the army. She is the leader of the National League of Democracy (NLD) which has 60 per cent seats in the Parliament, could have introduced a law to take action against the military atrocities. As an elected leader, she should have taken the responsibility to address the condition in the Rakhine State and stop violence against other minorities. 

According to Yanghee Lee, a United Nations expert monitoring development in Myanmar, Suu Kyi's government has fared worse than previous Thein Sein government. There is an increased number of arrests of reporters and others who have expressed their views against the government, under her reign.

The above argument is correct to an extent, but the ground reality is different. The army still retains a substantial role in Myanmarese politics. They have a two-third reservation in the Parliament; the Ministers of Home Affairs, Border Affairs, and Defense are also appointed by them. Even though the 2015 election has established a government elected by people, the power is shared with the army. Hence, expecting Suu Kyi to resolve the issue by introducing a bill in the Parliament and making a change is far-fetched. 

Unfortunately, the entire country is unanimous on the Rohingya; the latter is considered as Bengali and not Myanmarese. Such a national sentiment makes speaking on behalf of the Rohingya or refuting the prevalent notion detrimental for her political career. Suu Kyi is a politician, and she needs to appease her vote bank to work towards her upcoming elections. Additionally, she is part of the same societal construct; to expect her to have a different belief is not a practical one.

Moreover, the Rohingya crisis is not the only issue in Myanmar, which is marred with ethnic armed conflicts. Since coming to power, Suu Kyi's primary goal has been signing the National Ceasefire Agreement with all ethnic armed groups and the army. After five years in power, she may not succeed in her goal but have made an effort to work with the army for the same. This is remarkable given their history. Therefore, her silence on the Rohingya crisis could be a small sacrifice for the larger objective. 

Blaming Suu Kyi: What about the others? 

There are other perpetrators, Suu Kyi is not the only one to be blamed. First, the military. If Sui Kyi prosecuted, it might pave the way for the military to return to power. Recently, the US imposed a travel ban on four topmost military officials including the current Commander-in-Chief. But such bans remain ineffective.

Second, the larger problem is society. It should share the blame equally. The Burmese (the biggest ethnic group) and other ethnic groups who are fighting against the Burmese are united in their strong stand against the Rohingya. The term 'Rohingya' is not used by anyone apart from the Rohingyas within Myanmar. It is believed that they migrated to Myanmar from erstwhile colonial India's Bengal Province. The difference in complexion, language, and culture are cited as evidence of the Rohingyas not being from Myanmar. Rohingyas might be a crisis for the rest of the world; but for Myanmar, they are receiving undeserved attention. 

Finally, the regional actors. Should they not share the blame for doing nothing? The ASEAN members have been discussing this issue in their summits; but they have taken no steps to resolve it. Indonesia and Malaysia have been vocal for the Rohingyas, but no other steps were taken. 

Hence, prosecuting Suu Kyi cannot be a solution. She may be just an easy target. Also, punishing Suu Kyi will not pull down Myanmar: rather, it would consider as an unjust step taken for people who do not belong to their country. It will deteriorate the situation rather than helping the Rohingyas. 

Print Bookmark

Other CWA Publications

Conflict Weekly
May 2022 | CWA # 739

IPRI Team

Another racial attack in the US, Divide within the EU over the Russian oil ban, and violence in Israel

read more
NIAS Africa Weekly
May 2022 | CWA # 738

NIAS Africa Team

IN FOCUS | Communal Tensions in Ethiopia

read more
France Presidential Elections 2022
May 2022 | CWA # 737

Padmashree Anandhan

What does Macron's victory mean for France and the EU

read more
France Presidential Elections 2022
May 2022 | CWA # 736

Rishma Banerjee

The rise of Marine Le Pen

read more
France Presidential Elections 2022
May 2022 | CWA # 735

Ashwin Immanuel Dhanabalan

Five reasons why Emmanuel Macron won

read more
France Presidential Elections 2022
May 2022 | CWA # 734

Sourina Bej

Four challenges ahead for President Macron

read more
Conflict Weekly Cover Story
May 2022 | CWA # 733

S Shaji

Sudan, three years after Omar al Bashir

read more
Conflict Weekly
May 2022 | CWA # 732

IPRI Team

Intensifying political crisis in Sri Lanka, Communal tensions in Ethiopia, and 75 days of Ukraine war

read more
NIAS Africa Weekly
May 2022 | CWA # 731

NIAS Africa Team

IN FOCUS | Mali ends defence ties with France

read more
The World This Week
May 2022 | CWA # 730

GP Team

India-Nordic Summit, and New EU sanctions on Russia

read more
Conflict Weekly
May 2022 | CWA # 729

IPRI Team

Mali-France tensions and anti-UK protests in the Virgin Islands

read more
The World This Week
May 2022 | CWA # 728

GP Team

New US assistance for Ukraine

read more
Conflict Weekly
April 2022 | CWA # 727

IPRI Team

​​​​​​​UK-Rwanda asylum deal, Mexico's continuing femicides, and Afghanistan's sectarian violence

read more
NIAS Africa Weekly
April 2022 | CWA # 726

NIAS Africa Team

IN FOCUS | UK-Rwanda asylum deal

read more
The World This Week
April 2022 | CWA # 725

GP Team

China's Boao Forum for Asia, Russia's new ICBM test, and a Cold War in the Solomon Islands

read more
Conflict Weekly
April 2022 | CWA # 724

IPRI Team

The battle for Donbas, Violence in Jerusalem, Riots in Sweden, Kyrgyzstan- Tajikistan border dialogue, and China’s military drills

read more

Click below links for year wise archive
2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018