TWTW note

CWA # 1781
TWTW note
The US-EU Trade Deal:
Balancing under pressure
The World This Week #322 Vol 7, No 31, 03 Aug 2025

Swati Sood
3 August 2025

Photo Source: Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters

The following note was earlier published in The World This Week #322 Vol 7, No 31, 03 Aug 2025

What happened? 
On 25 July, US President Donald Trump stated that there was a 50-50 chance that the US would reach a trade agreement with the EU. 

On 27 July, Trump agreed on a trade deal with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, describing it as the “biggest deal ever made.” 

On 28 July, various European leaders welcomed the deal, with EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic saying that this was “the best deal we could get under very difficult circumstances.” However, other European leaders criticised the deal. Italian Prime Minister Georgia Meloni stated that the agreement ensured stability but was incomplete with “a number of elements” missing in “particularly sensitive sectors” such as pharmaceuticals and the automobile industry. Countries with higher export volumes to the US, such as Germany and the Netherlands, welcomed the trade deal, whereas the French Prime Minister called it a “dark day” because Europe had resigned itself to “submission.” 

On 31 July, Trump issued an executive order modifying tariff rates, imposing 0-15 per cent tariffs on goods imported from the EU. 

What is the background?
First, a brief note on reciprocal tariffs and US-EU trade tensions. On 12 July, Trump announced that 30 per cent tariffs would be imposed on the EU, warning that any retaliatory tariffs would be added on top of the 30 per cent base rate. On 14 July, EU leaders responded by preparing counter-tariffs targeting US goods worth EUR 72 billion. On 17 July, Trump said that a deal was “possible.” On 18 July, President Trump threatened to impose tariffs of 15-20 per cent on all goods imported from the EU. The EU and the US share the world's largest bilateral trade relationship, with a trade volume of EUR 1.6 trillion in 2023. The EU is not just a critical supplier to the US but also the largest buyer of US natural gas and oil.  

Second, the Trump-EU relationship. President Trump has advocated for ensuring US allies–including the EU–contribute to their partnership with the US on equal terms. A recurring point of contention has been the ‘imbalanced’ nature of the trade relationship between both economies. Last year, Trump stated that US allies are given military protection; however, they exploit the US in terms of trade. He argued that this will not continue anymore, declaring that the United States will be a “tariff nation.” In January 2025, Trump highlighted that the EU has been “very unfair” and that there are “some very big complaints with the EU,” calling it “nastier than China.”

Third, internal rifts within the EU. Member states within the EU remained divided over the response to reciprocal tariffs. France and Spain pushed for a tougher approach with immediate retaliation, while high export volume countries like Germany and the Netherlands urged caution and highlighted the importance of a deal with the United States.

Fourth, the EU’s dependence on China. 100 per cent of heavy rare earth elements in the EU are supplied by China, including terbium, samarium, and dysprosium. These critical raw materials (CRMs) are pivotal for producing permanent magnets used in electric vehicles, wind turbines, and advanced consumer electronics. Additionally, China is a major supplier of laptops, solar panels, and lithium-ion batteries, consisting of materials like lithium, cobalt, graphite, and gallium that are essential for the EU's digital and clean-energy transition. Thus, there were concerns within Europe that failure to reach a trade deal with the US could result in Chinese exporters pivoting towards unexplored market segments in Europe. 

What does it mean? 
First, the impact on the economy of the US and the EU. Tariffs imposed on imported EU goods will increase production costs and commodity prices in the United States. These inflationary pressures can reduce purchasing power and overall consumption, thereby worsening the cost-of-living crisis. Further, European goods will become more expensive and less competitive in the American market, potentially reducing EU exports. Low export volume will reduce production and wages, resulting in a marginal reduction in the EU’s GDP. On the other hand, the EU’s decision to drop tariffs on US goods will provide EU consumers and businesses with affordable goods. US exports with duty-free access to European markets will ensure a positive outlook for manufacturing and employment in the United States; however, high input costs due to expensive imports of raw materials from the EU could limit substantial gains.

Second, implications for EU-China relations. The US-EU trade deal reshapes the EU's economic ties with China. While the EU has sought to align itself strategically with the US, diversifying the supply of critical raw materials (CRMs) is an incremental process. If the US fails to meet European demand, the EU can find itself managing a dual dependence on the world’s two largest economies.

About the Author
Swati Sood is an undergraduate student in Political Science at the University of Delhi.

PREVIOUS COMMENTS

February 2026 | CWA # 1959

Yesasvi Koganti | Yesasvi Koganti is an undergraduate student from Madras Christian College, Chennai.

UK and China
February 2026 | CWA # 1957

R Preetha | R Preetha is pursuing post-graduation in the Department of International Studies, Stella Maris College, Chennai, and is a Research Assistant at the National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru.

The India–US interim trade framework
February 2026 | CWA # 1956

Lekshmi MK | Lekshmi MK is pursuing post-graduation in the Department of Political Science, Madras Christian College, Chennai, and is a Research Assistant at the National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru.

End of the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START)
State of Global Politics 2025
December 2025 | CWA # 1931

Padmashree Anandhan

NATO Summit 2025
State of Global Politics 2025
December 2025 | CWA # 1924

Padmashree Anandhan

NATO Summit 2025
This Week in History
August 2025 | CWA # 1801

R Preetha

28 August 1963
TWTW note
August 2025 | CWA # 1780

Abhiruchi Chowdhury

Trump tariffs:
This Week in History
August 2025 | CWA # 1778

Lekshmi MK

28 July 1914
TWTW Note
June 2025 | CWA # 1694

Aashish Ganeshan

The US:
CW Note
May 2025 | CWA # 1689

Padmashree Anandhan

Ukraine
CW Note
May 2025 | CWA # 1688

Ayan Datta

Gaza
CW Note
May 2025 | CWA # 1675

Lekshmi MK

Turkey:
CW Note
May 2025 | CWA # 1673

Padmashree Anandhan

Ukraine:
TWTW Note
May 2025 | CWA # 1667

R Preetha and Brighty Ann Sarah

East Asia:
NIAS Global Politics Database
March 2024 | CWA # 1251

NIAS Africa Team

Africa This Week
NIAS Global Politics Database
February 2024 | CWA # 1226

NIAS Africa Team

Africa This Week
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1189

Hoimi Mukherjee | Hoimi Mukherjee is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Political Science in Bankura Zilla Saradamani Mahila Mahavidyapith.

Chile in 2023: Crises of Constitutionality
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1187

Aprajita Kashyap | Aprajita Kashyap is a faculty of Latin American Studies, School of International Studies at the Jawaharlal Nehru University New Delhi.

Haiti in 2023: The Humanitarian Crisis
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1185

Binod Khanal | Binod Khanal is a Doctoral candidate at the Centre for European Studies, School of International Studies, JNU, New Delhi.

The Baltic: Energy, Russia, NATO and China
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1183

Padmashree Anandhan | Padmashree Anandhan is a Research Associate at the School of Conflict and Security Studies, National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bangaluru.

Germany in 2023: Defence, Economy and Energy Triangle
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1178

​​​​​​​Ashok Alex Luke | Ashok Alex Luke is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Political Science at CMS College, Kottayam.

China and South Asia in 2023: Advantage Beijing?
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1177

Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri | Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri is a postgraduate student at the Department of Defence and Strategic Studies at the University of Madras, Chennai.

China and East Asia
The War in Ukraine
October 2023 | CWA # 1091

Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri

Issues for Europe
IPRI Quarterly Forecasts I Triggers, Trends, and Trajectories
July 2023 | CWA # 1012

Bibhu Prasad Routray

Myanmar continues to burn
2022: The World This Year
December 2022 | CWA # 879

Padmashree Anandhan

The Ukraine War
Europe: Heatwaves, Wildfires, Droughts, and Ice Melt in Alps
November 2022 | CWA # 838

Rishma Banerjee

Tracing Europe's droughts
NIAS Africa Weekly
March 2022 | CWA # 705

NIAS Africa Team

In Focus: Libya
The World This Week: 150th Issue
December 2021 | CWA # 630

GP Team

Europe in 2021
Pakistan Reader
October 2021 | CWA # 588

Abigail Miriam Fernandez

TLP is back again
NIAS Fortnightly on Science, Technology & International Relations
August 2021 | CWA # 528

STIR Team

Space Tourism
Science, Technology and International Relations
September 2019 | CWA # 162

Lakshman Chakravarthy N

5G: A Primer
South Asia Monthly Brief (Nov 2018)
December 2018 | CWA # 71

Mahesh Bhatta | Centre for South Asian Studies, Kathmandu

Nepal
South Asia Monthly Brief (Nov 2018)
December 2018 | CWA # 70

Nasima Khatoon | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

The Maldives
South Asia Monthly Brief (Nov 2018)
December 2018 | CWA # 69

Harini Madhusudan | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

India
South Asia Monthly Brief (Nov 2018)
December 2018 | CWA # 68

Sourina Bej | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

Bangladesh
South Asia Monthly Brief (Nov 2018)
December 2018 | CWA # 67

Seetha Lakshmi Dinesh Iyer | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

Afghanistan