CW Note

CW Note
The War in Ukraine: The Trilateral Talks, and the Deadlock over Donetsk & Security Guarantees for Kyiv
Conflict Weekly 317, 30 January 2026, Vol 7, No. 4

Lekshmi MK
31 January 2026

Photo Source:

In the news
On 24 January, Ukraine, Russia and the United States held peace talks in Abu Dhabi after previous negotiations in Moscow and Berlin. Russia’s demand to withdraw Kyiv's forces from the Donbas remains a major sticking point that Kyiv firmly rejects. There has been no sign of compromise on the territorial dispute. As the talks continued, Russian forces carried out air strikes on Kyiv and other areas. Ukraine’s Foreign Minister said that Russia launched attacks on Ukraine during the talks, calling the timing “cynical.”

On 26 January, the media reported that Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky announced that the US-backed security guarantees document for Ukraine is “100% ready,” following the trilateral peace talks in Abu Dhabi. President Zelensky said the agreement underscores Ukraine’s need for US security guarantees, while reaffirming Kyiv’s stance on territorial integrity.

On 28 January, the media reported that Russia and Ukraine negotiators are to meet again on Sunday in Abu Dhabi, with possible participation by US officials. The Financial Times reported that the Trump administration has signalled to Ukraine that future US security guarantees may be tied to Kyiv agreeing to a peace deal that would involve ceding control of the Donbas region to Russia.

On 29 January, the US Secretary of State Marco Rubio described the issue of control over Donetsk as “very difficult” and still requiring work to bridge differences between Moscow and Kyiv at US-mediated talks. He said there might be a US presence in follow-up talks.

Issues at large
First, the stalemate over territorial integrity and security guarantees. The primary issue has been over Ukraine’s insistence on preserving its territorial integrity and its demand for credible US security guarantees. Reports indicate that Washington is signalling that such security assurances may be tied to Ukraine agreeing to withdraw from areas of Donetsk. This places Ukraine in a difficult position, where securing future protection appears to depend on accepting the present territorial compromise.

Second, continuing disagreement over Donetsk. The disagreement over control of parts of Donetsk in the Donbas region remains a key sticking point in the peace talks. Russia wants Ukraine to withdraw its forces from areas of Donetsk that Kyiv still holds. Moscow sees full control of this region as necessary for any lasting settlement. However, Ukraine strongly opposes leaving these areas, as doing so would entail giving up more territory and weakening its position. For Kyiv, such a move would undermine its sovereignty and appear to accept territorial loss by force. This unresolved territorial disagreement over Donetsk continues to slow progress in the negotiations.

Third, the narrowing focus of negotiations. As the talks progress, the focus of the discussions has become narrower and more specific. Earlier, negotiations covered broad issues such as ceasefire arrangements, humanitarian concerns, and general security matters. Now, the talks are mainly centred on difficult territorial questions, especially the status of Donetsk and the wider Donbas region. This shift shows that both sides realise that without addressing core territorial disputes, no agreement can be reached. As a result, other issues have taken a back seat while negotiators try to resolve the most sensitive and decisive matters first.

Fourth, continuing Russian military strikes and the issue of trust. Even as peace talks continue, Russian strikes on Ukrainian cities have not stopped. Missile and drone attacks during negotiations show that the war is still active on the ground. These attacks create a serious trust problem between the two sides. Ukraine sees the strikes as a sign that Russia is not fully committed to diplomacy and may use military pressure to strengthen its position at the negotiation. The continuing strikes highlight the fragile and uncertain nature of the peace process.

In perspective
First, a settlement would require Ukraine to make tough decisions over its territory and securing long-term US security guarantees. It also shows that peace may come with compromises that Kyiv earlier refused to consider.

Second, the US neutrality. Its security guarantees to Kyiv, linked to Ukraine's acceptance of territorial compromise, raise questions about Washington’s neutrality.

Third, Russia leverages military pressure to shape negotiations. Russia’s actions on the ground show that it is using the battlefield to gain an advantage in negotiations. This creates pressure on Ukraine and shapes the tone of diplomacy. Instead of building trust, these attacks remind all sides that Russia holds military leverage. Russia may use it to push for favourable terms in any possible agreement.

PREVIOUS COMMENTS

February 2026 | CWA # 1959

Yesasvi Koganti | Yesasvi Koganti is an undergraduate student from Madras Christian College, Chennai.

UK and China
February 2026 | CWA # 1957

R Preetha | R Preetha is pursuing post-graduation in the Department of International Studies, Stella Maris College, Chennai, and is a Research Assistant at the National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru.

The India–US interim trade framework
February 2026 | CWA # 1956

Lekshmi MK | Lekshmi MK is pursuing post-graduation in the Department of Political Science, Madras Christian College, Chennai, and is a Research Assistant at the National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru.

End of the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START)
December 2025 | CWA # 1931

Padmashree Anandhan

NATO Summit 2025
December 2025 | CWA # 1924

Padmashree Anandhan

NATO Summit 2025
August 2025 | CWA # 1801

R Preetha

28 August 1963
August 2025 | CWA # 1780

Abhiruchi Chowdhury

Trump tariffs:
August 2025 | CWA # 1778

Lekshmi MK

28 July 1914
June 2025 | CWA # 1694

Aashish Ganeshan

The US:
May 2025 | CWA # 1689

Padmashree Anandhan

Ukraine
May 2025 | CWA # 1688

Ayan Datta

Gaza
May 2025 | CWA # 1675

Lekshmi MK

Turkey:
May 2025 | CWA # 1673

Padmashree Anandhan

Ukraine:
May 2025 | CWA # 1667

R Preetha and Brighty Ann Sarah

East Asia:
March 2024 | CWA # 1251

NIAS Africa Team

Africa This Week
February 2024 | CWA # 1226

NIAS Africa Team

Africa This Week
December 2023 | CWA # 1189

Hoimi Mukherjee | Hoimi Mukherjee is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Political Science in Bankura Zilla Saradamani Mahila Mahavidyapith.

Chile in 2023: Crises of Constitutionality
December 2023 | CWA # 1187

Aprajita Kashyap | Aprajita Kashyap is a faculty of Latin American Studies, School of International Studies at the Jawaharlal Nehru University New Delhi.

Haiti in 2023: The Humanitarian Crisis
December 2023 | CWA # 1185

Binod Khanal | Binod Khanal is a Doctoral candidate at the Centre for European Studies, School of International Studies, JNU, New Delhi.

The Baltic: Energy, Russia, NATO and China
December 2023 | CWA # 1183

Padmashree Anandhan | Padmashree Anandhan is a Research Associate at the School of Conflict and Security Studies, National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bangaluru.

Germany in 2023: Defence, Economy and Energy Triangle
December 2023 | CWA # 1178

​​​​​​​Ashok Alex Luke | Ashok Alex Luke is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Political Science at CMS College, Kottayam.

China and South Asia in 2023: Advantage Beijing?
December 2023 | CWA # 1177

Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri | Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri is a postgraduate student at the Department of Defence and Strategic Studies at the University of Madras, Chennai.

China and East Asia
October 2023 | CWA # 1091

Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri

Issues for Europe
July 2023 | CWA # 1012

Bibhu Prasad Routray

Myanmar continues to burn
December 2022 | CWA # 879

Padmashree Anandhan

The Ukraine War
November 2022 | CWA # 838

Rishma Banerjee

Tracing Europe's droughts
March 2022 | CWA # 705

NIAS Africa Team

In Focus: Libya
December 2021 | CWA # 630

GP Team

Europe in 2021
October 2021 | CWA # 588

Abigail Miriam Fernandez

TLP is back again
August 2021 | CWA # 528

STIR Team

Space Tourism
September 2019 | CWA # 162

Lakshman Chakravarthy N

5G: A Primer
December 2018 | CWA # 71

Mahesh Bhatta | Centre for South Asian Studies, Kathmandu

Nepal
December 2018 | CWA # 70

Nasima Khatoon | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

The Maldives
December 2018 | CWA # 69

Harini Madhusudan | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

India
December 2018 | CWA # 68

Sourina Bej | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

Bangladesh
December 2018 | CWA # 67

Seetha Lakshmi Dinesh Iyer | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

Afghanistan