Global Politics

Photo Source: The Tribune
   NIAS Course on Global Politics
National Institute of Advanced Studies (NIAS)
Indian Institute of Science Campus, Bangalore
For any further information or to subscribe to GP alerts send an email to subachandran@nias.res.in

CWA # 44, 21 July 2018
Global Politics
Quad as an alternative to the BRI: Three Main Challenges

  Divyabharathi E

Will the Quad be coherent and consistent towards China despite their bilateral arrangements? Will the Quad be open and inclusive towards others like China’s BRI? With Trump's "America First" strategy, is the United States willing to fund into such an immense project overseas?

Divyabharathi E

Ms Divyabharathi E is a Research Scholar at the Department of International Studies, Stella Maris College, Chennai. She can be contacted at e.divyabharathi19@gmail.com

 

The United States, Australia, India, and Japan had been considering the establishment of a joint regional infrastructure plan to counter China’s multibillion-dollar Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Though the officials from these countries clarified the plan to be an ‘alternative’ not a ‘rival’ to BRI. It’s too early to tell how and when this proposed plan may materialize since it is still at the discussion stage. This is not the first time the “Quad,” have teamed up to attempt to develop a common approach to China.

Will the Quad be coherent and consistent towards China despite their bilateral arrangements? Will the Quad be open and inclusive towards others like China’s BRI? With Trump's "America First" strategy, is the United States willing to fund into such an immense project overseas?

If Quad has to provide an alternative to the BRI, it has to face the following three challenges.

 

1. Quad’s Bilateral Relations with China

A stable relationship with China is pivotal to every one of these economies. Conservative states like Australia feel awkward about China's rise and frequently dispatch political or ideological crusades against Beijing. In any case, realism and pragmatism will prevail.

For instance, Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull's government has sounded intense toward China, cutting Beijing for interference in Australia's local governmental issues. Notwithstanding, before his latest visit to the United States, Turnbull set a more placating tone and said China was "not a threat." In Washington, he expressed that it was off base to paint the United States and its partners like Australia as being against China in some kind of rerun of the Cold War. While recognizing some "perplexing and troublesome issues" with China, the Australian government has denied a diplomatic freeze or cold war between the two countries.

The Trump administration inclines toward reciprocal ways to deal with multilateral agreements in international issues and looks for a productive association with China in spite of contrasts with China on trade and other issues.

 

2. BRI is Inclusive than Quad

China's BRI stays open and comprehensive, and China respects the support of all countries, including the "Quad." The idea may have originated from China, however, it is together held "owned" by every participating countries and the dividends of development are for everybody to share. However the "Quad" countries have been tepid to the BRI from the earliest starting point, though recently they appear to have turned out to be more open, and both the United States and Australia sent ministerial-level official delegations to the May 2017 BRI Forum in Beijing. In any case, doubts stay high. Specifically, India contradicts the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor.

India and Japan issued the vision report of their proposed Asia Africa Growth Corridor (AAGC) in May 2017 and started to elevate it to counter the Maritime Silk Road of the BRI. The AAGC vision uses some of the keywords from the BRI, for example, regional cooperation, quality infrastructure, connectivity, people-to-people exchanges, and so forth. In any case, India and Japan still can't seem to clarify, convincingly, why the AAGC is better than the BRI. As a supplement to the BRI, the AAGC ought to be invited by others, including China; as a vital counterforce against China that brings pressures up in the area, it ought not to be.

Cordial relations between India and China are fundamental to the Asian Century. Currently, these relations have reached a strained tipping point with major irritants like the boundary dispute, the supply of nuclear technology, military and diplomatic support to Pakistan, blocking Indian membership to the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) and countering Indian efforts to have Jaish-e-Mohamed chief Masood Azhar named an UN-designated terrorist. Moreover, the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) and the Doklam standoff saw India-China relations take a roller coaster ride throughout 2017. Given their bilateral irritants, global leadership aspirations, new geopolitical alignments have trapped India and China in several competing situations, straining their cordiality. The Quad, revived recently, will create more mistrust between the Himalayan neighbours.

 

3. Who will finance the Quad?

With Trump's "America First" arrangement, is the United States willing to put resources into such an immense undertaking abroad? Also, where will the investments come from? Japan's Abenomics has accomplished some positive outcomes yet a long and winding street lies ahead as far as its monetary recuperation. India tends to overstate Beijing's expectations in South Asia and consider itself to be an associate to China in each aspect. China has been Australia's biggest trading partner, export market, and import source since 2009. It is not in any of the “Quad” countries’ interest to disrupt their dynamic and beneficial relations with China and none is likely to come up with the money needed to fund the proposed project.

 

Will Quad materialize?

The proposed plan is an economic project, yet fundamentally it speaks to these countries' political, strategic, and diplomatic endeavours to react to China’s rise. Some in the “Quad” has still not become accustomed to the new expanding Chinese power and influence. It is justifiable that they may feel awkward about or even undermined by China's massive projects like the BRI. However, China's development has profited different countries too.

China is not entitled to equally circulate the advantages of globalization. The ideal approach to manage China's ascent is not to block it but to work with China and shape Asia's developing political and economic orders together. Advancing, both China and the "Quad" must reaffirm their sense of duty regarding collaboration and cooperation as the best way to address their disparities and advance common development.

Print Bookmark

PREVIOUS COMMENTS

NIAS Global Politics Database
March 2024 | CWA # 1251

NIAS Africa Team

Africa This Week
NIAS Global Politics Database
February 2024 | CWA # 1226

NIAS Africa Team

Africa This Week
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1189

Hoimi Mukherjee | Hoimi Mukherjee is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Political Science in Bankura Zilla Saradamani Mahila Mahavidyapith.

Chile in 2023: Crises of Constitutionality
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1187

Aprajita Kashyap | Aprajita Kashyap is a faculty of Latin American Studies, School of International Studies at the Jawaharlal Nehru University New Delhi.

Haiti in 2023: The Humanitarian Crisis
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1185

Binod Khanal | Binod Khanal is a Doctoral candidate at the Centre for European Studies, School of International Studies, JNU, New Delhi.

The Baltic: Energy, Russia, NATO and China
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1183

Padmashree Anandhan | Padmashree Anandhan is a Research Associate at the School of Conflict and Security Studies, National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bangaluru.

Germany in 2023: Defence, Economy and Energy Triangle
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1178

​​​​​​​Ashok Alex Luke | Ashok Alex Luke is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Political Science at CMS College, Kottayam.

China and South Asia in 2023: Advantage Beijing?
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1177

Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri | Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri is a postgraduate student at the Department of Defence and Strategic Studies at the University of Madras, Chennai.

China and East Asia
The War in Ukraine
October 2023 | CWA # 1091

Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri

Issues for Europe
IPRI Quarterly Forecasts I Triggers, Trends, and Trajectories
July 2023 | CWA # 1012

Bibhu Prasad Routray

Myanmar continues to burn
2022: The World This Year
December 2022 | CWA # 879

Padmashree Anandhan

The Ukraine War
Europe: Heatwaves, Wildfires, Droughts, and Ice Melt in Alps
November 2022 | CWA # 838

Rishma Banerjee

Tracing Europe's droughts
NIAS Africa Weekly
March 2022 | CWA # 705

NIAS Africa Team

In Focus: Libya
The World This Week: 150th Issue
December 2021 | CWA # 630

GP Team

Europe in 2021
Pakistan Reader
October 2021 | CWA # 588

Abigail Miriam Fernandez

TLP is back again
NIAS Fortnightly on Science, Technology & International Relations
August 2021 | CWA # 528

STIR Team

Space Tourism
Science, Technology and International Relations
September 2019 | CWA # 162

Lakshman Chakravarthy N

5G: A Primer
South Asia Monthly Brief (Nov 2018)
December 2018 | CWA # 71

Mahesh Bhatta | Centre for South Asian Studies, Kathmandu

Nepal
South Asia Monthly Brief (Nov 2018)
December 2018 | CWA # 70

Nasima Khatoon | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

The Maldives
South Asia Monthly Brief (Nov 2018)
December 2018 | CWA # 69

Harini Madhusudan | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

India
South Asia Monthly Brief (Nov 2018)
December 2018 | CWA # 68

Sourina Bej | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

Bangladesh
South Asia Monthly Brief (Nov 2018)
December 2018 | CWA # 67

Seetha Lakshmi Dinesh Iyer | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

Afghanistan