CW Note

Photo Source:
   NIAS Course on Global Politics
National Institute of Advanced Studies (NIAS)
Indian Institute of Science Campus, Bangalore
For any further information or to subscribe to GP alerts send an email to subachandran@nias.res.in

CWA # 1671
CW Note
US, Ukraine and Russia:
Air attacks amidst a Minerals deal and Ceasefire Proposals
Conflict Weekly #278&279, 1 May 2025, Vol 6, Nos 17 & 18

  Abhiruchi Chowdhury
5 May 2025

Conflict Weekly #278&279, 1 May 2025, Vol 6, Nos 17 & 18
An initiative by NIAS-IPRI

The following note was published as a part of IPRI Conflict Weekly

 

In the news
On 30 April, the US and Ukraine signed an agreement to split the gains incurred by selling mineral and energy resources of the latter in future. As part of the deal, an “investment fund” would be formulated, which would facilitate US projects on the development of Ukraine’s mineral wealth.  

On 29 April, Russia launched drone assaults on Kharkiv and Dnipro, injuring around 38 people and killing one. On the same day, two people were killed and three others were injured in Ukraine’s drone attack on Belgorod, Russia.

On 28 April, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin announced a “unilateral three-day ceasefire” from 8 May. Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy termed Putin’s announcement as “another attempt at manipulation.” 

On 26 April, US President Donald Trump and Zelenskyy held a discussion in the Vatican. Zelenskyy, on social media, expressed gratitude for Trump and called it a “good meeting.” He wrote: “Very symbolic meeting that has potential to become historic, if we achieve joint results.”
On the same day, after the Russian missile and drone attacks on Kyiv, Trump questioned Putin’s intentions regarding the peace deal. He questioned: “It makes me think, that he doesn’t want to stop the war, he’s just tapping me along and has to be dealt differently, through banking or secondary sections?”

Issues at large
First, the three earlier failed ceasefires. On 19 April, on Easter day, Putin announced to cease in attacks on Ukraine for 30 hours, highlighting “humanitarian consideration.” However, Zelenskyy claimed that Russia violated the ceasefire roughly 3000 times. He alleged that Russia carried out intense shelling on Pokrovsk, a city in the eastern part of the country. Russia asserted that Ukraine carried out attacks during the truce using US weapons. On 25 March, the White House announced another ceasefire where Russia and Ukraine agreed to cease attacks against each other’s energy installations and in the Black Sea. A few hours later, Russia accused Ukraine of carrying out a drone strike on the power installations in Bryansk and Kursk. Ukraine, however, rejected Moscow’s accusations. On 18 March, Trump and Putin held a telephone conversation, with Russia agreeing to cease attacks against Ukraine’s energy installations. However, Zelenskyy accused Russia of breaching the ceasefire by attacking a hospital in Sumy.   

Second, the continuing Russian offence against Ukraine amidst peace talks. On 24 April, Russia launched drone missile assaults on Kyiv, killing 12 people and injuring 30 others. This was one of the most lethal assaults on Kyiv since 8 July 2024. There was another attack on Zaporizhzhia, which injured 38 people. After the easter ceasefire came to an end on 21 April, Ukraine accused Russia of hurling drone and missile attacks in Mykolaiv and Kherson.   

Third, the difference in positions of the EU, Russia and the US on the peace proposal. Trump had claimed that a major part of the peace proposal had been agreed upon. As per Reuters, the US’ peace proposal has agreed to recognise Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk as parts of Russia. However, in Ukraine and Europe’s proposal, a ceasefire is suggested as a precondition for discussions on the future of the Russian-annexed territories. Further, the US’ peace proposal puts the onus of Ukraine’s security on the “coalition of willing.” On the contrary, Europe’s peace proposal demands that the US provide a firm security commitment to Ukraine that must be on the lines of Article 5 of the NATO charter.   

Fourth, the different interests in the minerals deal. Trump had continually pushed for signing the minerals deal to receive monetary compensation for the financial assistance of about USD 375.8 billion, which the US provided to Ukraine since the war began. Additionally, access to Ukraine’s rare earth minerals is seen as part of Trump’s vision to bring the US back to the centre of technological advancement. Ukraine, on the other hand, saw the minerals deal as an opportunity to gain “security guarantees” from the US, to prevent future attacks from Russia.   
 
In perspective
First, Ukraine was unable to get what it had initially desired to get from the minerals deal. The lack of security guarantees from the US means that Trump has been able to successfully push his agenda of receiving monetary benefit sometime in future from Ukraine without overtly confronting Moscow. The minerals deal is a defeat for Ukraine and Europe’s anti-Russia agenda.

Second, Trump’s practical approach towards Russia’s continued offence against Ukraine. Although Trump did condemn Russia’s attacks on Ukraine amid negotiations of peace deal, he did not apply any further sanctions on Russia. Trump realised that applying any further sanctions would prolong the duration of the war and diminish the chances of achieving a peace deal.

Print Bookmark

PREVIOUS COMMENTS

This Week in History
August 2025 | CWA # 1801

R Preetha

28 August 1963
TWTW note
August 2025 | CWA # 1780

Abhiruchi Chowdhury

Trump tariffs:
This Week in History
August 2025 | CWA # 1778

Lekshmi MK

28 July 1914
TWTW Note
June 2025 | CWA # 1694

Aashish Ganeshan

The US:
CW Note
May 2025 | CWA # 1689

Padmashree Anandhan

Ukraine
CW Note
May 2025 | CWA # 1688

Ayan Datta

Gaza
CW Note
May 2025 | CWA # 1675

Lekshmi MK

Turkey:
CW Note
May 2025 | CWA # 1673

Padmashree Anandhan

Ukraine:
TWTW Note
May 2025 | CWA # 1667

R Preetha and Brighty Ann Sarah

East Asia:
NIAS Global Politics Database
March 2024 | CWA # 1251

NIAS Africa Team

Africa This Week
NIAS Global Politics Database
February 2024 | CWA # 1226

NIAS Africa Team

Africa This Week
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1189

Hoimi Mukherjee | Hoimi Mukherjee is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Political Science in Bankura Zilla Saradamani Mahila Mahavidyapith.

Chile in 2023: Crises of Constitutionality
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1187

Aprajita Kashyap | Aprajita Kashyap is a faculty of Latin American Studies, School of International Studies at the Jawaharlal Nehru University New Delhi.

Haiti in 2023: The Humanitarian Crisis
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1185

Binod Khanal | Binod Khanal is a Doctoral candidate at the Centre for European Studies, School of International Studies, JNU, New Delhi.

The Baltic: Energy, Russia, NATO and China
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1183

Padmashree Anandhan | Padmashree Anandhan is a Research Associate at the School of Conflict and Security Studies, National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bangaluru.

Germany in 2023: Defence, Economy and Energy Triangle
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1178

​​​​​​​Ashok Alex Luke | Ashok Alex Luke is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Political Science at CMS College, Kottayam.

China and South Asia in 2023: Advantage Beijing?
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1177

Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri | Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri is a postgraduate student at the Department of Defence and Strategic Studies at the University of Madras, Chennai.

China and East Asia
The War in Ukraine
October 2023 | CWA # 1091

Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri

Issues for Europe
IPRI Quarterly Forecasts I Triggers, Trends, and Trajectories
July 2023 | CWA # 1012

Bibhu Prasad Routray

Myanmar continues to burn
2022: The World This Year
December 2022 | CWA # 879

Padmashree Anandhan

The Ukraine War
Europe: Heatwaves, Wildfires, Droughts, and Ice Melt in Alps
November 2022 | CWA # 838

Rishma Banerjee

Tracing Europe's droughts
NIAS Africa Weekly
March 2022 | CWA # 705

NIAS Africa Team

In Focus: Libya
The World This Week: 150th Issue
December 2021 | CWA # 630

GP Team

Europe in 2021
Pakistan Reader
October 2021 | CWA # 588

Abigail Miriam Fernandez

TLP is back again
NIAS Fortnightly on Science, Technology & International Relations
August 2021 | CWA # 528

STIR Team

Space Tourism
Science, Technology and International Relations
September 2019 | CWA # 162

Lakshman Chakravarthy N

5G: A Primer
South Asia Monthly Brief (Nov 2018)
December 2018 | CWA # 71

Mahesh Bhatta | Centre for South Asian Studies, Kathmandu

Nepal
South Asia Monthly Brief (Nov 2018)
December 2018 | CWA # 70

Nasima Khatoon | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

The Maldives
South Asia Monthly Brief (Nov 2018)
December 2018 | CWA # 69

Harini Madhusudan | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

India
South Asia Monthly Brief (Nov 2018)
December 2018 | CWA # 68

Sourina Bej | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

Bangladesh
South Asia Monthly Brief (Nov 2018)
December 2018 | CWA # 67

Seetha Lakshmi Dinesh Iyer | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

Afghanistan