Conflict Weekly 300th Issue

Conflict Weekly 300th Issue
Sudan: A Civil War’s Implications Beyond Borders
Africa
Conflict Weekly 300, 25 September 2025, Vol 6, No. 38

Ayan Datta
25 September 2025

Photo Source: Reuters

The civil war in Sudan has crossed two years, and has now divided the country between East and West. In March, the SAF, with Turkish and Iranian drones, pushed out the RSF troops in Omdurman and Khartoum North. By July, the SAF retook the government buildings, including the Presidential Palace, Khartoum airport, Central Bank, and state broadcasting office in Khartoum. The besieged SAF garrison in Darfur’s El Fashir remains the sole exception to the trend. Encircled by RSF troops, El Fashir is continually subjected to bombardment by the rebels’ recently acquired Chinese-made drones. The Rapid Support Forces (RSF) are operating from their traditional power base in Western Sudan, stretching from Darfur and Kordofan up to the White Nile. Meanwhile, the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) based in Port Sudan gained control over the capital Khartoum, the Southeast and key Eastern towns and cities, especially those along the Nile. While the war continues, almost dividing the country, the regional implications are multifold.

The following are the major regional implications of the war. 

1. Regional military involvement. With the war grinding towards an East-West stalemate and over three million refugees fleeing Sudan, both factions invited external support from the region and beyond. The support from the immediate neighbours has tilted mostly towards Burhan’s SAF. Egypt, a long-time government ally, has been supporting Burhan militarily, providing his air force with much-needed reinforcements. Egypt’s air force has also been suspected to be launching pro-SAF bombing missions from its territory. 

To Sudan’s East, Eritrea has agreed to host army training camps on its borders and keep its doors open to Sudanese refugees. The Eritrean government has also been sending clandestine mercenary fighters to bolster the SAF’s Eastern flanks. Abiy Ahmed’s government in Ethiopia has been suspected of mobilising Tigrayan fighters to prevent a spillover of the fighting into their borders. Chad’s President Mahamat Deby and US-backed Libyan National Army (LNA) chief Khalifa Haftar have been aiding RSF chief Hemedti, mainly by facilitating his access to Emirati and Russian assistance. 

2. Political and security implications for Egypt and Chad. Besides drawing regional actors into Sudan, the war, especially the outflows of refugees, has had destabilising political effects on Sudan’s neighbourhood and the wider Sahel region. Egypt and Chad, which host the bulk of Sudanese refugees — the numbers hover around 1.5 million and 770,000 respectively — have become entangled in complex refugee politics and socio-political tensions. In Egypt, the refugee influx has worsened pre-existing economic pressure. In response, the government has reversed its earlier policy of welcoming the Sudanese influx and has designed a publicised train system to return the refugees to their country of origin. This move has invited tacit encouragement from the EU, which wants to prevent Egypt from becoming a transit hub for Sudanese refugees wanting to enter Europe. To keep the “problem” contained, Brussels recently signed a USD 8.7 billion deal with Cairo for the latter to bolster its sea borders. It reflects how Sudanese refugees have become pawns in the hands of regional actors as “problems” to be “managed” as per the designs of other countries. The Sudanese refugees in overcrowded camps are unwelcome in Chadian villages. The refugees have been involved in clashes with locals, contesting for essentials like water. The tribal chiefs feel threatened by Hemedti’s massacre of the non-Arab Masalit community in Darfur. Similar tensions surrounding Sudanese refugees can be seen in Ethiopia, home to around 50,000 Sudanese refugees. Here, the Amhara-based rebel group FANO has capitalised on anti-refugee sentiment, attacking, killing and raping the camp-dwellers for local approval. 

3. Destabilising effects in South Sudan. The war in Sudan has impacted the political crisis in South Sudan. The war in Sudan destroyed a critical pipeline used to export oil, cutting almost two-thirds of the already fragile state’s revenues. The setback weakened President Sava Kiir’s control over key political figures and was partially responsible for the recent crackdown on Vice-President Reik Machar. Fighting in Sudan could spill over into South Sudan, especially with the SAF’s interest in controlling South Sudan’s Upper Nile region to prevent the RSF from pushing further eastward. 

What does it mean?
The conflict’s regional fallouts reveal the shortcomings of regional integration and porous borders across the Sahel. As the Interpol-backed research centre ENACT recently uncovered, the war has been prolonged by a vast network of cross-border arms and precious metals smuggling networks operating through the porous boundaries between Libya, Chad and Sudan. Increasingly, these local arms and gold dealers active in these networks have acquired the backing of US-backed Libyan rebel Khalifa Haftar and corrupt local officials in Chad’s army and in Sudan’s RSF. Over time, the officials enabling these informal, state-backed networks have developed vested interests in prolonging the war, since they can personally profit from weapons and gold smuggling. The incentive for ceasefires or peace deals, therefore, remains weak in the wider region.

 A second East-West partition, with an RSF-controlled West and SAF-ruled East, is increasingly becoming a viable option for the self-serving aspirations of both factions. However, the September 2025 proposals by the East Africa-based Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) and the “Quad group” of Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and the US are unlikely to find much traction. The proposal’s focus on a humanitarian ceasefire, a civilian-led and unified future for Sudan, does not recognise the deep divisions between the SAF’s Arab leadership and the RSF’s aspirational non-Arab chieftains. They do not account for the vested interests that both leaderships have developed with cross-border arms and precious metals smuggling networks. Unless future peace proposals recognise this dominance and extractive nature of Sudan’s military elites, their civilian-focused orientation will fail to have an impact on the ground. For the foreseeable future, therefore, Sudan’s civil war will prove intractable. 


About the author
Ayan Datta holds a Master of Arts (Political Science) University of Hyderabad. His research interests include International Relations Theory, Comparative Politics of Africa, and Peace and Conflict Issues in Sub-Saharan Africa. 
 

PREVIOUS COMMENTS

February 2026 | CWA # 1959

Yesasvi Koganti | Yesasvi Koganti is an undergraduate student from Madras Christian College, Chennai.

UK and China
February 2026 | CWA # 1957

R Preetha | R Preetha is pursuing post-graduation in the Department of International Studies, Stella Maris College, Chennai, and is a Research Assistant at the National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru.

The India–US interim trade framework
February 2026 | CWA # 1956

Lekshmi MK | Lekshmi MK is pursuing post-graduation in the Department of Political Science, Madras Christian College, Chennai, and is a Research Assistant at the National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru.

End of the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START)
December 2025 | CWA # 1931

Padmashree Anandhan

NATO Summit 2025
December 2025 | CWA # 1924

Padmashree Anandhan

NATO Summit 2025
August 2025 | CWA # 1801

R Preetha

28 August 1963
August 2025 | CWA # 1780

Abhiruchi Chowdhury

Trump tariffs:
August 2025 | CWA # 1778

Lekshmi MK

28 July 1914
June 2025 | CWA # 1694

Aashish Ganeshan

The US:
May 2025 | CWA # 1689

Padmashree Anandhan

Ukraine
May 2025 | CWA # 1688

Ayan Datta

Gaza
May 2025 | CWA # 1675

Lekshmi MK

Turkey:
May 2025 | CWA # 1673

Padmashree Anandhan

Ukraine:
May 2025 | CWA # 1667

R Preetha and Brighty Ann Sarah

East Asia:
March 2024 | CWA # 1251

NIAS Africa Team

Africa This Week
February 2024 | CWA # 1226

NIAS Africa Team

Africa This Week
December 2023 | CWA # 1189

Hoimi Mukherjee | Hoimi Mukherjee is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Political Science in Bankura Zilla Saradamani Mahila Mahavidyapith.

Chile in 2023: Crises of Constitutionality
December 2023 | CWA # 1187

Aprajita Kashyap | Aprajita Kashyap is a faculty of Latin American Studies, School of International Studies at the Jawaharlal Nehru University New Delhi.

Haiti in 2023: The Humanitarian Crisis
December 2023 | CWA # 1185

Binod Khanal | Binod Khanal is a Doctoral candidate at the Centre for European Studies, School of International Studies, JNU, New Delhi.

The Baltic: Energy, Russia, NATO and China
December 2023 | CWA # 1183

Padmashree Anandhan | Padmashree Anandhan is a Research Associate at the School of Conflict and Security Studies, National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bangaluru.

Germany in 2023: Defence, Economy and Energy Triangle
December 2023 | CWA # 1178

​​​​​​​Ashok Alex Luke | Ashok Alex Luke is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Political Science at CMS College, Kottayam.

China and South Asia in 2023: Advantage Beijing?
December 2023 | CWA # 1177

Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri | Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri is a postgraduate student at the Department of Defence and Strategic Studies at the University of Madras, Chennai.

China and East Asia
October 2023 | CWA # 1091

Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri

Issues for Europe
July 2023 | CWA # 1012

Bibhu Prasad Routray

Myanmar continues to burn
December 2022 | CWA # 879

Padmashree Anandhan

The Ukraine War
November 2022 | CWA # 838

Rishma Banerjee

Tracing Europe's droughts
March 2022 | CWA # 705

NIAS Africa Team

In Focus: Libya
December 2021 | CWA # 630

GP Team

Europe in 2021
October 2021 | CWA # 588

Abigail Miriam Fernandez

TLP is back again
August 2021 | CWA # 528

STIR Team

Space Tourism
September 2019 | CWA # 162

Lakshman Chakravarthy N

5G: A Primer
December 2018 | CWA # 71

Mahesh Bhatta | Centre for South Asian Studies, Kathmandu

Nepal
December 2018 | CWA # 70

Nasima Khatoon | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

The Maldives
December 2018 | CWA # 69

Harini Madhusudan | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

India
December 2018 | CWA # 68

Sourina Bej | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

Bangladesh
December 2018 | CWA # 67

Seetha Lakshmi Dinesh Iyer | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

Afghanistan