NIAS Polar and Ocean Studies

NIAS Polar and Ocean Studies
The New Cold War: Military Build-up in the High North

Rohit Paswan
22 October 2024
Photo Source: National Geographic

In the current geopolitical scenario, the Arctic is increasingly gaining acknowledgement as a distinct region of interest worldwide. Composed of eight sovereign states, namely, the US, Russia, Sweden, Norway, Canada, Denmark, and Iceland, the region has a history of cooperation and great power competition. 

However, these dynamics are transforming the stakeholders of the region are reexamining the region for its strategic importance and economic potential. As to why it is happening now can be answered by the following factors: (a) climate change induced alteration of the region through diminishing ice coverage, (b) improved technology in the field of science and defence, (c) discovery of natural resources, (d) new geopolitical developments. 

Due to the changing environment of the Arctic, several Arctic countries are claiming undefined areas as part of their territory, causing conflict over ownership and creating an atmosphere of tension in the region. This in turn is leading to the militarization of the region by the Arctic states. 

Geopolitical trends such as Russia planting its flag in the seabed of the North Pole and the annexation of Crimea caused security dilemma in the West, reducing dialogue between them. Instead, increased military exercises by the US and NATO in the region ultimately lead to military build-up in the High North. These series of events can be interpreted either as a New Cold War or the continuation of the old Cold War.

How the geopolitics of the world is translating to the geopolitics of the Arctic?
The diminishing ice coverage in the Arctic is opening the region to new opportunities and challenges for global players. Earlier the region was characterized by international cooperation where arctic states worked together to protect the fragile environment and its indigenous communities. 

However, a transition from cooperation to conflict began in 2007 with the Russian claim over North Pole which caused security concerns among the other Arctic states. Further, the US Geological Survey's report on the discovery of large amounts of oil and natural gas increased the economic interest of both Arctic and non-arctic nations.

Moreover, the Russian annexation of Crimea in 2014 further deteriorated the relation between the two blocs. The West retorted by putting sanctions on Russia and calling it out on the international forum. However, the complete boycott of Russia happened with the breakout of the Russia-Ukraine war in 2022 where once again the West attempted to isolate Russia from the international community by putting sanctions on it. The spill-over effect of the Crimean annexation and the War in Ukraine affected cooperation in the Arctic as it limited the dialogue and deconfliction between the two, leading to the militarization of their respective arctic regions. 

Another global power that is increasing its presence in the Arctic is China. The growing Chinese interest in the region is because of the Arctic's economic potential and strategic importance. Hence, despite not being a geographically Arctic nation, China proclaimed itself to be a “near Arctic State” to justify its involvement in the Arctic.  

Additionally, the increasing proximity between Russia and China is visible through Chinese investment in infrastructure projects along the Polar Silk Road as part of its Belt and Road Initiative and resource extraction in Russia and Greenland. These activities are a growing cause of concern amongst US and its NATO allies. Thus, China’s tilt towards a particular side can cause major shifts in the balance of power between the two blocs.

How is regional conflict amongst Arctic states increasing the extent of militarization in the region? 
While the Arctic States continue to highlight some traits of cooperation in regional affairs, it is evident that the politics between the great powers such as Russia, China, US and some of the European Union members impact the dynamics of the Arctic and possibly contribute to the increase of militarization in the region. 

The causes for these conflicts are multifaceted, namely, the competition for Arctic resources, territorial disputes, and the strategic importance of the Arctic which threaten to create friction between the five Arctic nations, Norway, Denmark, Russia, Canada, and US. 

Keeping in mind that the international system is anarchic in nature and states are sovereign actors, the scope of conflict and confrontation cannot be ignored. Moreover, conflict and disturbance in the Arctic can also be caused by external involvements in the region as the profits from the Arctic transcend regional boundaries and reach other continents and countries.

One of the major players in the region is Russia, thus its geopolitical choices vis-a-vis the other major powers, most evident through the power struggle between Russia and the US, have the most significant impacts on the ground. The increased military movement that has arisen as a result of the growing tension between them has created an environment of instability in the region. 

In response to the Russian military expansion, other states have started to strengthen their military presence in the region through fleet expansion by increasing the number of icebreakers in their navy, developing cold weather-resistant infrastructure, increasing military exercises in collaboration with other Arctic nations, and forming an Arctic-orientated strategy.

Apart from Russia, Canada has emerged as one of the significant players in the region. The investment made by the Canadian authorities consist of turning their deepwater port into a naval base on Baffin Island, improving their defense capabilities, increasing the number of ice breaker in the naval fleet, establishing Canadian winter forces, building six to eight ice hardened offshore patrol vessel, cooperating regionally in the field of security and governance, enhancing the extent of military exercises in the region, and conducting joint military operations such as Nanook with US and Denmark in air, sea and land.

Denmark is also seeking to increase its military capabilities to secure its land and sea in the Greenland. Denmark’s force, the Danish Greenland and its other force commands are combined into a joint service Arctic command. Further, a specialized Arctic response force is also commissioned for the security and surveillance of the region. The country is using combat aircraft for surveillance and increasing Arctic maritime presence through their RDN Vaedderen.

Meanwhile, Norway has moved a part of its armed forces in the north such as the modern frigate fleet, and jet fighter force. Norway’s claim over the Gakkel Ridge as an extension of its Svalbard continental shelf is pushing Russia to enter Norway’s air traffic zone. Russia's frequent maneuvers into the airspace of one of the founding members of NATO that is Norway is causing insecurity among the NATO members and therefore escalating the military buildup in the Norwegian region.

Hence, the military escalation of the Arctic states is proof of their regional conflicts as the security dilemma caused by one state pushes the other states to increase their military strength. Thus, military escalation is an unavoidable situation in an anarchic world order where every sovereign state is strengthening its military might as part of deter and defence strategy.

The Russian Arctic strategy and NATO’s response
During the Cold War, the Arctic held strategic importance for both blocs because of its geography. The physical proximity that exists between the US and Russia in the Arctic region and the placement of weapon systems was the best staging location for striking at each other, indicating the significance of the region for a deterrence policy.

To explain why States behave the way they behave, the realist perspective argues that the end of the Cold War which fostered an era of cooperation and peaceful coexistence between great powers is nothing more than a period of recovery after which the power struggle will come into play again. In the anarchic world system states are driven by their national interests that persuade them to meet their end goal through any means. Thus, cooperation and peaceful coexistence are utopian concepts in an anarchic system. States as rational actors navigating themselves in a system that is shaped by power politics, national interest, and the pursuit of security and self-preservation.

The application of theory into practice can be seen in the classic case of the Russia-NATO rivalry, both of whom are major players in the region and thus have greater influence than others in the Arctic. After the end of the Cold War, NATO’s strategy was to include the members of the former Warsaw Pact and the USSR such as the three Baltic states to balance out Russia. While the Baltic states saw this as an opportunity to find a way into the European Union and be reintegrated with Europe, some others saw it as an opportunity to overcome their historic military asymmetry against the greater power. However, the Russian administration interpreted it as a threat to its national security.

At the 2007 Munich Security Conference, Russia argued that the West was taking advantage of its weakness and attacking its interests. This was followed by a period of extensive Russian military rebuilding and modernization. In the same year, Russia hoisted its flag in the seabed of the North Pole through its polar expedition.

Russia has the largest Arctic coastline. The region contributes to around 10 per cent of its GDP and 20 per cent of exports. Russia maintains more than 40 icebreakers, seven of which are nuclear. It is also constructing new ones to protect its transportation and communication. The strategy of reopening and modernizing the Soviet-era Arctic bases, establishing an Arctic command, and adapting “the fundamental of Russian state policy in the Arctic up to 2020 and beyond” by the Russian Security Council, means increasing military presence, conducting more frequent exercises such as patrolling the arctic coastline, deploying an advanced air defence system, testing new weapons designed for arctic condition, increasing submarine activity and large scale military exercise including multiple branches of forces.

In response to the Russian increased military presence, other states have started to strengthen their presence through expansion of their military in the area.

The US has created an Arctic roadmap to counter Russian military expansionism. The annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the Russia-Ukraine war have changed the level of engagement between Russia and the US, by reducing the dialogue and deconfliction between the two sides and instead, has increased the security dilemma culminating in both camps increasing their military capabilities in their respective regions. As a result, US is building its military might and developing an Arctic centric policy as part of its deter and defence strategy which includes a new Atlantic command to monitor and manage the arctic region. US has already reestablished its 2nd fleet in the region and built new ice breakers called “polar security cutters” to make its presence felt in the region.

The 2018 Arctic exercise, Trident Juncture, conducted between the US, NATO, Sweden and Finland was the largest military exercise since the Cold War. Moreover, US carrier strike groups conducting high-end warfare training in the High North have become a cause of concern for Russia. Nevertheless, NATO and the US are focused on improving cold weather combat capabilities, developing specific arctic strategies, improving military infrastructure, building new cold resistance ports and airfields, and enhancing surveillance over Russian military activities. These activities improve their military interpretabilities and cold weather skills and establish credible deterrence in the High North.

Conclusion
With time, the Arctic region will be characterized by growing economic potential because of its maritime trade routes and resources, environmental concerns, increasing military conflicts, and the spillover effect of geopolitical developments. Thus, the phrase “high north, low tension” does not seem feasible in the near future.

The unpredictable weather and the hostile environment of the Arctic make it challenging to operate in the region. Therefore, sustaining a military presence there is expensive. However, resource allocation to the deployed forces needs to be judicious and meet global standards. Yet, these obstacles are not stopping the Arctic States from expanding their range of Arctic military operations. They are driven by two factors, i.e. to exploit the economic potential of the region and to demonstrate their military might. To do so, the nature of militarization is transforming from a predominance of air and undersea confrontation characteristic of the old Cold War to land and maritime presence in the open sea. 

The two major powers in the region, the US and Russia, have both been strengthening and expanding their forces be it in the domains of Arctic air, sea, or land to deter others. Thus, the geographic proximity of both countries in the Arctic and their security dilemma has pushed them to their old Cold War position of antagonism.  Therefore, the temporary decrease in their strength does not indicate the end of the Cold War but rather can be defined as a “period of thaw” that resprouted in the form of military build-up in the High North that is but a continuation of the old Cold War. 

References
Gosnell, Rachael, “The Militarization of the Arctic is not Certain”, CISSM Policy Brief, Center for International and Security Studies, Maryland, December 2018
Hellqvist, Elsa, “
Frozen Diplomacy: Regional Causes for the Increased Militarization in the Arctic”, Dept. of Government Political Science C, Uppsala University, (2020)
Huebert, Rob, “
A New Cold War in the Arctic?! The Old One Never Ended!”, Arctic Yearbook, (2019), Dept. of Political Science, University of Calgary
Osthagen, Andreas, “
The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: Three Levels of Arctic Geopolitics”, The Arctic and World Order (2020), Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press: Chapter 15, pp. 357-378.
Spohr, Alexandre Piffero, et. al, “
The Militarization of the Arctic: Political, Economic and Climate
Challenges”, UFRGSMUN, UFRGS Model United Nations Journal, (2013), Volume 1, p. 11-70, ISSN: 2318-3195


PREVIOUS COMMENTS

April 2026 | CWA # 2065

Lakshmi Venugopal Menon

The Middle East (Jan–Mar 2026):
The US-Iran War, Israel-Hamas Conflict and their interconnected fallouts
April 2026 | CWA # 2064

Anwesha Ghosh

Afghanistan (Jan–Mar 2026):
Gender Repression, Leadership Rifts, Regional Realignments and Clashes with Pakistan
April 2026 | CWA # 2063

Ramya B

Russia (Jan-Mar 2026)
Assertive Military Posture, Attempts for an Economic Turnaround and Search for Partners
April 2026 | CWA # 2062

Himani Pant

Europe (Jan-Mar 2026)
Trade diversification & FTAs, Increased defence spending, Tightening irregular migration and Economic slowdown
April 2026 | CWA # 2061

S Shaji

Africa (Jan-Mar 2026)
Elections, Civil Wars, Militancy and Peace Initiatives
April 2026 | CWA # 2059

Adarsh Vijay

India and the World (Jan-Mar 2026)
Maintaining Strategic Autonomy, Balancing the US relations and Resetting the China ties 
April 2026 | CWA # 2058

Nishchal N Pandey  & Mahesh Raj Bhatta

Nepal (Jan-Mar 2026)
Political Upheaval, Generational Change and Economic Uncertainty
April 2026 | CWA # 2057

Bibhu Prasad Routray

Myanmar (Jan-Mar 2026)
An Illegitimate Regime’s Consolidation Game
April 2026 | CWA # 2056

Ashik J Bonofer

Southeast Asia (Jan-Mar 2026)
Deteriorating situation in Myanmar, Philippines as the ASEAN Chair, New government in Thailand, and Economic & Environmental challenges
April 2026 | CWA # 2055

Haans J Freddy

East Asia (Jan-Mar 2026)
China’s military operations near Taiwan, Japan-China tensions and South Korea’s security challenges
April 2026 | CWA # 2052

Shreya Upadhyay

The United States (Jan-Mar 2026)
Tariffs, Ukraine, Iran and Operationalization of Trump’s World Order
March 2026 | CWA # 2039

Femy Francis

Trump-Xi Meeting
Why did Trump reschedule it? What does that mean?
March 2026 | CWA # 2035

Akshath Kaimal

Pakistan-Afghanistan Conflict
Broken ceasefire, Expanding military strikes and Worsening humanitarian situation
March 2026 | CWA # 2033

Mahesh Bhatta

Nepal after elections:
Five major challenges for the new government
March 2026 | CWA # 2024

Lekshmi MK

The UN and the Iran-US War
UNSC Resolution 2817 between “Clear and Unified Message” and “Manifest Injustice”
March 2026 | CWA # 2023

Femy Francis

China’s Two Sessions 2026
New Five-Year Plan, Ethnic Unity Law, and an Enhanced Defence Budget
March 2026 | CWA # 2019

Akshath Kaimal

Rising Violence in Nigeria
Limited State Capacity, Multiple Actors, and a Complex Security Environment
March 2026 | CWA # 2012

Padmashree Anandhan

The War in Ukraine
Long-range strikes, Defence adaptation and the EU’s energy dependence
March 2026 | CWA # 2010

Mahesh Bhatta

Nepal Elections 2026
The Rise of the “New” and the Fall of the “Old”
March 2026 | CWA # 2009

Sreemaya Nair

Nepal Elections 2026
Rise of a new leadership and Reset in political landscape
February 2026 | CWA # 1998

Anu Maria Joseph

Instability in Sudan
Response to the genocide call and the threats of a regional spillover
February 2026 | CWA # 1985

Abhimanyu Solanki

Basant in Pakistan
The return of Basant, and what it signifies
February 2026 | CWA # 1977

Anu Maria Joseph

Violence in Nigeria
US military deployment amidst worsening insurgency
February 2026 | CWA # 1976

Lekshmi MK

The War in Ukraine
The Geneva Talks and Growing Negotiation Asymmetry
December 2025 | CWA # 1971

Vani Vyshnavi Jupudi

Pakistan Budget 2025-26
Legislating stabilisation under IMF discipline and coalition constraints
December 2025 | CWA # 1970

Aparna A Nair

Pakistan & China
Ten Years of China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC)
November 2025 | CWA # 1968

Vani Vyshnavi Jupudi

Pakistan and the US
A New opening, or another cycle?
February 2026 | CWA # 1959

Yesasvi Koganti

UK and China
PM Keir Starmer’s visit and the Recalibration of Economic, Strategic, and Domestic ties
January 2026 | CWA # 1946

R Preetha

The Davos Summit 2026
Five Major Takeaways from The World Economic Forum
December 2025 | CWA # 1931

Padmashree Anandhan

NATO Summit 2025
December 2025 | CWA # 1924

Padmashree Anandhan

NATO Summit 2025
August 2025 | CWA # 1801

R Preetha

28 August 1963
Martin Luther King's "I Have a Dream" speech and the Civil Rights Movement in the US
August 2025 | CWA # 1790

GP Team

The World This Week#323-324
The Trump-Putin meeting & the US-China tariff extension
August 2025 | CWA # 1780

Abhiruchi Chowdhury

Trump tariffs:
Weaponization of access to the US economy
August 2025 | CWA # 1779

GP Team

The World This Week#322
US tariffs on India, Brazil and Canada & the EU-US trade deal
August 2025 | CWA # 1778

Lekshmi MK

28 July 1914
Austria-Hungary declares war on Serbia, starting the First World War
July 2025 | CWA # 1770

Abhiruchi Chowdhury

Pakistan-Afghanistan relations:
Why the focus on terrorism, refugees, and Uzbekistan as the third partner?
July 2025 | CWA # 1769

GP Team

The World This Week#321
Indian PM Modi's visit to the Maldives I Elections to the Upper House in Japan
July 2025 | CWA # 1762

Lekshmi MK

Ocean Darkening: 
What is the phenomenon? What are its effects? And who are more vulnerable?
July 2025 | CWA # 1749

R Preetha

Africa as the Hunger Epicenter
Of the 13 Global Hunger Hotspots, 8 are in Africa: Five reasons why
July 2025 | CWA # 1748

GP Team

The World This Week #318
PM Modi’s Visit to Trinidad and Tobago & Ghana, One big beautiful bill, and Quad Foreign Ministers Meeting
July 2025 | CWA # 1744

Chittrothu Vaihali

EU-Canada Summit 2025
What is security and defence partnership all about?
July 2025 | CWA # 1742

IPRI Team

Conflict Weekly # 287-88
The 12 Day War and the Congo-Rwanda Peace Deal
July 2025 | CWA # 1738

Fleur Elizabeth Philip

Thailand and Cambodia
What was the phone call between PM Shinawatra and President of Senate Hun Sen? What is the border dispute between the two? Why has this become an issue?
June 2025 | CWA # 1735

Padmashree Anandhan

NATO Summit 2025:
Trump making Europe great again
June 2025 | CWA # 1734

GP Team

The World This Week #317
NATO Summit 2025 and Russia-Mali bilateral agreements
June 2025 | CWA # 1733

Ananya Dinesh

China and the Pacific Islands 
What was the recent China-PIC joint statement about? What it says, and what it means?
June 2025 | CWA # 1728

M Kejia

G7 Summit 2025:
The Focus on the Middle East and Trade negotiations
June 2025 | CWA # 1727

Aparna A Nair

Second China-Central Asia Summit:
China’s continuing search for regional partners, and the emphasis on the BRI
June 2025 | CWA # 1726

GP Team

The World This Week #316
China-Central Asia Summit in Kazakhstan, and the G7 Summit in Canada
June 2025 | CWA # 1725

Brighty Ann Sarah, R Preetha, Santhiya M, Aparna A Nair & M Kejia

Operation Midnight Hammer: US bombs three nuclear sites in Iran
What were the three Iranian nuclear sites that were targeted? What are the B2 Bombers and Bunker Buster Bombs? What do these attacks mean? What Next?
June 2025 | CWA # 1724

IPRI Team

Conflict Weekly #286
The Spiralling Israel-Iran Crisis, and the Dangerous Hunger Hotspots
June 2025 | CWA # 1721

Rizwana Banu S and Santhiya M

Who are the Afrikaners?
Why is Trump interested in the Afrikaner question in South Africa?
June 2025 | CWA # 1720

Lekshmi MK

New WMO Report on Arctic Warming
What are the social, economic and environmental implications of Arctic warming
June 2025 | CWA # 1719

J Yamini  

China’s EV Surge
What contributes to the rise of BYD
June 2025 | CWA # 1717

J Yamini

Gender Violence in Pakistan:
What are the larger issues in the Noor Mukadam case?
June 2025 | CWA # 1715

Femy Francis

The US-China:
On Tariffs, Rare Earths and Visas
June 2025 | CWA # 1713

GP Team

The World This Week #315
The UN Ocean Conference in France and the US-China Meeting in London
June 2025 | CWA # 1709

IPRI Team

Conflict Weekly #284-285
Cambodia-Thailand Border Tensions, Protests in the US, and the Indigenous Māori question in New Zealand
June 2025 | CWA # 1705

GP Team

The World This Week #314
Elections in South Korea and Poland I China and the Pacific Island Countries I Bangladesh Election Announcement 2026
June 2025 | CWA # 1703

M Kejia 

Sagarmatha Sambaad in Nepal
Kathmandu’s Global Agenda for the Himalayas
June 2025 | CWA # 1700

R Preetha

Ethiopia bans the TPLF
What does the TPLF ban mean for the Pretoria agreement? What next for Ethiopia?
June 2025 | CWA # 1694

Aashish Ganeshan

The US:
Harvard vs Trump Administration
June 2025 | CWA # 1691

GP Team

The World This Week #313
China-ASEAN-GCC Summit I President Macron's visit to South East Asia I Trump Vs Harvard
May 2025 | CWA # 1690

GP Team

The World This Week #312
Elections in Romania, Portugal & Poland I UK-EU Summit
May 2025 | CWA # 1689

Padmashree Anandhan

Ukraine
Continuing Russia’s Aerial Attacks, despite exchange of prisoners
May 2025 | CWA # 1688

Ayan Datta

Gaza
The Humanitarian Crisis and Israel’s Renewed Offensive
May 2025 | CWA # 1685

Aparna A Nair

UK-EU Summit:
First step towards a reset
May 2025 | CWA # 1683

Aashish Ganeshan

Elections in Portugal:
The Rise of Chega Party and the Search for Political Stability
May 2025 | CWA # 1679

Aashish Ganeshan

US in the Middle Easr
Trump’s visit to Saudi Arabia, Qatar and UAE
May 2025 | CWA # 1678

Gauri Gupta

China in Latin America
China-CELAC forum: Strengthening ties with Latin America and Caribbean
May 2025 | CWA # 1677

GP Team

The World This Week #310-311
China in Latin America and the Carribbean I Trump's Middle East Visit I Denmark as the new Arctic Chair
May 2025 | CWA # 1675

Lekshmi MK

Turkey:
PKK disbands after 40 years of armed insurgency
May 2025 | CWA # 1673

Padmashree Anandhan

Ukraine:
The Discussion in Turkiye and the Elusive Ceasefire
May 2025 | CWA # 1672

D Suba Chandran

India and Pakistan:
De-escalation and the “New Normal”
May 2025 | CWA # 1671

Abhiruchi Chowdhury

US, Ukraine and Russia:
Air attacks amidst a Minerals deal and Ceasefire Proposals
May 2025 | CWA # 1670

Fleur Elizabeth Philip

Singapore Elections in 2025:
People’s Action Party (PAP) Wins, Again
May 2025 | CWA # 1667

R Preetha and Brighty Ann Sarah

East Asia:
Tough Tariff Negotiations with the US
May 2025 | CWA # 1666

Padmashree Anandhan

The US-Ukraine
The mineral deal with the US
May 2025 | CWA # 1665
Conflict Weekly # 280-81
India-Pakistan De-escalation I Ukraine Discussion in Istanbul I The Battle over Port Sudan I Disbanding of PKK in Turkiye I France-Algeria Diplomatic Tensions
May 2025 | CWA # 1663

R Preetha

Canada Elections 2025:
What do the results convey? What next for Mark Carney?
March 2024 | CWA # 1251

NIAS Africa Team

Africa This Week
February 2024 | CWA # 1226

NIAS Africa Team

Africa This Week
October 2023 | CWA # 1091

Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri

Issues for Europe
July 2023 | CWA # 1012

Bibhu Prasad Routray

Myanmar continues to burn
December 2022 | CWA # 879

Padmashree Anandhan

The Ukraine War
November 2022 | CWA # 838

Rishma Banerjee

Tracing Europe's droughts
March 2022 | CWA # 705

NIAS Africa Team

In Focus: Libya
December 2021 | CWA # 630

GP Team

Europe in 2021
October 2021 | CWA # 588

Abigail Miriam Fernandez

TLP is back again
August 2021 | CWA # 528

STIR Team

Space Tourism
September 2019 | CWA # 162

Lakshman Chakravarthy N

5G: A Primer
December 2018 | CWA # 71

Mahesh Bhatta

Nepal
December 2018 | CWA # 70

Nasima Khatoon

The Maldives
December 2018 | CWA # 69

Harini Madhusudan

India
December 2018 | CWA # 68

Sourina Bej

Bangladesh
December 2018 | CWA # 67

Seetha Lakshmi Dinesh Iyer

Afghanistan