TWTW Note

Photo Source: REUTERS/Zorana Jevtic
   NIAS Course on Global Politics
National Institute of Advanced Studies (NIAS)
Indian Institute of Science Campus, Bangalore
For any further information or to subscribe to GP alerts send an email to subachandran@nias.res.in

CWA # 1764
TWTW Note
US-EU Tariff tensions:
From dialogue to a deadlock
The World This Week #319 & 320 Vol 7, No 28 & 29, 20 July 2025

  Lekshmi MK & Swati Sood
20 July 2025

The following note was earlier published in The World This Week #319 & 320 Vol 7, No 28 & 29, 20 July 2025
US-EU Tariff tensions: 
From dialogue to a deadlock
Lekshmi MK and Swati Sood 

What happened?
On 12 July, President Donald Trump announced a 30 per cent tariff on most EU imports, applicable from 01 August. 

On 14 July, in response, EU leaders called the move “absolutely unacceptable” and pledged EUR 72 billion in counter-tariffs.

On 15 July, the EU postponed retaliation to allow talks. 

On 16 July, EU trade chief Maros Sefcovic visited Washington.

On 17 July, Trump hinted that a deal was “possible.” 

On 18 July, President Trump threatened to impose tariffs of 15-20 per cent on all goods imported from the EU.

What is the background?  
First, a brief note on President Trump’s reciprocal tariffs and the US-EU tariff negotiations. On 02 April 2025, President Trump launched Reciprocal Tariffs by invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose a universal 10 per cent tariff on all imports. This added surcharges of up to 20 per cent on the EU. In response, the EU introduced 25 per cent counter-tariffs worth EUR 21 billion on targeted US products. Later, the EU proposed expansion of tariffs to EUR 95 billion if no deal was reached. Both sides agreed to a 90-day pause with baseline US tariffs at 10 per cent, but further negotiations stalled. 

Second, a brief note on US-EU trade relations. The European Union and the United States have the world's largest bilateral trade and investment relationship. The US-EU trade in goods and services reached EUR 1.6 trillion in 2023. The European Union is a source of critical supplies to the United States, including medicinal ingredients and pharmaceutical products. The EU exported EUR 503 billion goods to the US market, while importing goods worth EUR 347 billion. This resulted in a goods trade surplus of EUR 157 billion for the EU. At the same time, the European Union is the largest buyer of the US natural gas and oil. 

Third, an internal divide within the EU over its response to Trump’s tariffs. The European Union experienced internal differences among its member states over how to respond to the tariff measures announced by President Trump. While the European Commission coordinated discussions on countermeasures, national governments remained divided in terms of their support. Countries with higher export volumes to the US, such as Germany, urge a swift resolution. Others adopt a more cautious approach. The lack of immediate consensus delays a unified EU response to Trump’s tariffs.

Fourth, other US-EU differences. Both are increasingly competing to attract green technology investments through large-scale subsidy programs. The US Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), with over USD 369 billion in clean energy incentives, offers generous tax credits to companies producing batteries, EVs, and renewable components within the US. In response, the EU launched its Green Deal Industrial Plan and the Net-Zero Industry Act. Also, the EU and several constituent countries, including France, Italy, and Spain, have targeted major US tech firms like Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple mainly through the EU Digital Markets Act (DMA), EU Digital Services Act (DSA), and national digital service taxes. The taxes were levied amid growing concerns that such firms were paying minimal taxes despite large profits in European markets. The United States viewed these national laws as unfair trade practices, which escalated tensions between the two sides.

What does it mean?
First, weaponisation of tariffs formulated into mistrust between US and the EU. The US kept using tariffs to protect its own economy, but this made Europe feel pressured. Instead of open talks, it felt more like a power move. Without clear plans, both sides couldn’t settle on common ground.

Second, deepening divides within the EU bloc. The lack of unity among EU member states weakens the bloc’s ability to respond decisively to external pressures like US tariffs. As a result, despite EU leaders’ willingness to negotiate, their fragmented stance limits progress toward a comprehensive trade deal with the US.

Third, green & digital policy clashes. The EU is committed to strict climate goals and digital regulations, which often conflict with US economic and corporate interests. Trump’s administration is more tilted more towards deregulation less towards EUs green priorities. These differences limit scope for deeper cooperation or compromise.

 

About the AuthorsLekshmi MK is a postgraduate student at the Department of Political Science, Madras Christian College. Swati Sood is an undergraduate student in Political Science at the University of Delhi. 

 

 

Print Bookmark

PREVIOUS COMMENTS

This Week in History
August 2025 | CWA # 1801

R Preetha

28 August 1963
TWTW note
August 2025 | CWA # 1780

Abhiruchi Chowdhury

Trump tariffs:
This Week in History
August 2025 | CWA # 1778

Lekshmi MK

28 July 1914
TWTW Note
June 2025 | CWA # 1694

Aashish Ganeshan

The US:
CW Note
May 2025 | CWA # 1689

Padmashree Anandhan

Ukraine
CW Note
May 2025 | CWA # 1688

Ayan Datta

Gaza
CW Note
May 2025 | CWA # 1675

Lekshmi MK

Turkey:
CW Note
May 2025 | CWA # 1673

Padmashree Anandhan

Ukraine:
TWTW Note
May 2025 | CWA # 1667

R Preetha and Brighty Ann Sarah

East Asia:
NIAS Global Politics Database
March 2024 | CWA # 1251

NIAS Africa Team

Africa This Week
NIAS Global Politics Database
February 2024 | CWA # 1226

NIAS Africa Team

Africa This Week
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1189

Hoimi Mukherjee | Hoimi Mukherjee is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Political Science in Bankura Zilla Saradamani Mahila Mahavidyapith.

Chile in 2023: Crises of Constitutionality
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1187

Aprajita Kashyap | Aprajita Kashyap is a faculty of Latin American Studies, School of International Studies at the Jawaharlal Nehru University New Delhi.

Haiti in 2023: The Humanitarian Crisis
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1185

Binod Khanal | Binod Khanal is a Doctoral candidate at the Centre for European Studies, School of International Studies, JNU, New Delhi.

The Baltic: Energy, Russia, NATO and China
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1183

Padmashree Anandhan | Padmashree Anandhan is a Research Associate at the School of Conflict and Security Studies, National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bangaluru.

Germany in 2023: Defence, Economy and Energy Triangle
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1178

​​​​​​​Ashok Alex Luke | Ashok Alex Luke is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Political Science at CMS College, Kottayam.

China and South Asia in 2023: Advantage Beijing?
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1177

Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri | Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri is a postgraduate student at the Department of Defence and Strategic Studies at the University of Madras, Chennai.

China and East Asia
The War in Ukraine
October 2023 | CWA # 1091

Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri

Issues for Europe
IPRI Quarterly Forecasts I Triggers, Trends, and Trajectories
July 2023 | CWA # 1012

Bibhu Prasad Routray

Myanmar continues to burn
2022: The World This Year
December 2022 | CWA # 879

Padmashree Anandhan

The Ukraine War
Europe: Heatwaves, Wildfires, Droughts, and Ice Melt in Alps
November 2022 | CWA # 838

Rishma Banerjee

Tracing Europe's droughts
NIAS Africa Weekly
March 2022 | CWA # 705

NIAS Africa Team

In Focus: Libya
The World This Week: 150th Issue
December 2021 | CWA # 630

GP Team

Europe in 2021
Pakistan Reader
October 2021 | CWA # 588

Abigail Miriam Fernandez

TLP is back again
NIAS Fortnightly on Science, Technology & International Relations
August 2021 | CWA # 528

STIR Team

Space Tourism
Science, Technology and International Relations
September 2019 | CWA # 162

Lakshman Chakravarthy N

5G: A Primer
South Asia Monthly Brief (Nov 2018)
December 2018 | CWA # 71

Mahesh Bhatta | Centre for South Asian Studies, Kathmandu

Nepal
South Asia Monthly Brief (Nov 2018)
December 2018 | CWA # 70

Nasima Khatoon | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

The Maldives
South Asia Monthly Brief (Nov 2018)
December 2018 | CWA # 69

Harini Madhusudan | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

India
South Asia Monthly Brief (Nov 2018)
December 2018 | CWA # 68

Sourina Bej | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

Bangladesh
South Asia Monthly Brief (Nov 2018)
December 2018 | CWA # 67

Seetha Lakshmi Dinesh Iyer | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

Afghanistan