Photo Source:
National Institute of Advanced Studies (NIAS)
Indian Institute of Science Campus, Bangalore
For any further information or to subscribe to GP alerts send an email to subachandran@nias.res.in
Global Politics Explainer
China-Australia Free Trade Agreement after ten years:
|
Femy FrancisÂ
|
On 16 July, China’s Ministry of Commerce and Australia's Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade signed an MoU to review the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement (FTA). The agreement was first signed in 2015 and has been responsible for the development of their bilateral economy and trade relations. The year 2025 marks the 10th anniversary of the FTA implementation where “both sides will maintain close cooperation, continue high-quality implementation of the agreement, jointly conduct a review to identify areas for further improvement or expansion, enhance the liberalization and facilitation of trade and investment, and provide higher-level institutional guarantees for bilateral economic and trade cooperation,” said China’s Commerce Ministry. China has been Australia's largest trading partner and export destination, as well as the source of imports, for 16 years. Since the agreement of 2015, the trade has increased, estimated to be USD 210 billion in 2024. Australia China Business Council and the Bankwest Curtin Economics Center reported that trade with China has increased Australia's household income by USD 1709 and even supported 595,600 jobs.
What is the background?
In 2015, the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement (ChAFTA) was signed after 21 rounds of negotiations. This was signed between Australia’s Trade and Investment Minister, Andrew Robb, and China’s Commerce Minister, Gao Hucheng. The deal was seen as a unique and liberal trade deal China signed with a developed country. Australia’s Prime Minister Tony Abbott said: “What you have collectively done is history-making for both our countries, it will change our countries for the better, it will change our region for the better, it will change our world for the better.”
What is the agreement all about?
Three things. First, Tariff cuts. Before the agreement, only 8.4 per cent of China’s goods were duty-free, and after the signing of the agreement in 2015, 95 per cent of tariffs were slated for Australian goods. Second, Market access. China opened its market to Australia, extending it beyond goods to include services. Australia also got the status of most-favoured-nation (MFN), extended to the service sector and Australian firms. Third, the Binding clause. The agreement outlined a binding clause, where Australian goods were entering the Chinese market at a lower tariff than China’s commitment made at the World Trade Organisation (WTO). The clause commits that China will not raise the tariff to WTO standards.
What are the issues?
The agreement was criticized domestically in Australia as a bad deal. The then-opposition party Labor Party, head Bill Shorten, declined to give support to the agreement, calling it a “dud deal.” The major criticism was about the labour mobility provision, where Shorten stated that the agreement should not allow unrestricted access to Australia’s labour market. And noted that they need Labour Market Testing (LMT) to test the availability of in-house Australian workers before recruiting individuals from overseas. ChAFTA’s labour mobility provision was called “a momentous concession for the Chinese.” This raised alarms that jobs will be given to Chinese nationals rather than locals, which will alter the labour market of Australia. Other criticisms include the inclusion of services from people from a country who have questionable records on industry safety. And that this will lead to one country’s dominance in the Australian market, hence creating larger strategic repercussions.
What are the outcomes?
Since the onset of the agreement, the following are the notable outcomes as reported by the University of Technology Sydney’s Australia-China Relations Institute (UTS: ACRI). The agreement cannot be attributed to Australia-China trade growth, as China has been Australia's largest trading partner for 16 years, much before the ChAFTA agreement. Therefore, the agreement did not kick off the economic collaboration, but opened avenues for increased investments and taking advantage of the lowering of trade barriers. In 2019, the ChAFTA utilization rate rose by 04.8 per cent and 96 per cent in 2021, which is the highest amongst all the FTAs Australia has signed. China’s imports of Australian goods increased by 90 per cent in 2017. China is Australia’s largest trading partner, with exports in 2024 reaching USD 70 billion. China imported USD 140 billion worth of Australian goods in 2024, according to COMTRADE. The trade saw a slight dip after COVID, when China imposed sanctions and duties on Australian goods. In retaliation for Australia citing the origins of the COVID strain to be Chinese.
By 2024, the exports increased to USD 212.7 billion under the ChAFTA provision from USD 85.2 billion. China’s exports increased in minerals, fuels, manufacturing, agricultural products, and the service sector. The 2020, tariffs were removed in 2024, and ties were restored, and the trade was back on track. Other than Australia’s exports to China also increased from a mere USD 59 billion in 2014, to USD 112 billion in 2023, an 89.5 per cent increase. Additionally, under ChAFTA, the Australian beef was given a concessional tariff, but China can impose a tariff if the export exceeds a specified limit. In a poll conducted by UTS: ACRI on the domestic opinion of the ChAFTA, 52.3 per cent of Australians saw the agreement as beneficial, with 12.5 per cent disagreeing. The recent visit by Albanese focused on reviewing the FTA agreement between the two countries. The Prime Minister also expressed larger concerns regarding Australia’s refusal to join the “Hypothetical” war between the US and China. And the expanding presence of China in the Pacific region. The ChAFTA agreement has been beneficial for both China and Australia, opening up trade barriers, giving opportunities to local businesses to grow internationally. The political and geopolitical repercussions are yet to be gauged, but China’s increasing presence in the region has set the alarm off. What’s understood is that economic collaboration must go on, despite geopolitical tensions and scepticism.
References:
Ma Jingjing and Yin Yeping, “China, Australia sign MoU to implement, review free trade agreement,” Global Times, 16 July 2025
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202507/1338470.shtml
“Xi says Australia and China should ‘unswervingly’ work together despite global instability,” The Guardian, 15 July 2025
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/jul/15/australian-journalists-confronted-china-security-guards-albanese-beijing-trip
Giulia Interesse and Yi Wu, “China-Australia Economic Ties: Trade, Investment, and Latest Updates,” , China Briefing, 08 July 2025
https://www.china-briefing.com/news/china-australia-bilateral-ties-opportunities-challenges-latest-updates
James Laurenceson, “The China-Australia Free Trade Agreement (ChAFTA): An Australian assessment of core outcomes a decade on,” UTS, 08 April 2025
https://www.uts.edu.au/news/2025/04/china-australia-free-trade-agreement-chafta-australian-assessment-core-outcomes-decade-on
| |
Bookmark |
Femy Francis | Femy Francis is a Project Associate at NIAS
“Let Beijing believe peaceful reunification is still possible”
Femy Francis
Ten Takeaways on White Paper "China’s Arms Control, Disarmament, and Non-proliferation in the New Era
Femy Francis
Japan-China Tensions over PM Takaichi's statement on Taiwan
Femy Francis
China, Yarlung Tsangpo and the Medog Hydropower Station
J Yamini Â
China’s EV Surge
Gauri Gupta
China’s debut Global Green Sovereign Bond
Aparna A Nair
Humanoid Robots: Why is China investing on them?
Emma Rose Boby
Bangladesh and China: What agreements did the Chief Executive Yunus sign during his recent Visit? What do they mean?
Femy Francis
China's Military drills near Taiwan Strait: Actions, Responses and Criticisms
Nova Karun K
China Development Forum 2025: The Focus on AI, High Tech Investments, and Domestic Consumption
C Shraddha
US-China Trade War: Tariffs, Retaliation and Fallouts
Ashna Pathak & Surangana Rajya Laxmi Rana
Health diplomacy: Nepal's growing dependence on China
Advik S Mohan
Bougainville’s struggle for independence: What is the problem, and what are the implications?
Femy Francis | Research Assistant at NIAS
06 May 1882: The US President signs the Chinese Exclusion Act, restricting immigration from China
Torunika Roy
China-Japan-South Korea Trilateral Summit: Key Outcomes and Implications
Femy Francis
China-Arab States Summit, and Xi’s “Five Cooperation Frameworkâ€
Akhil Ajith
Taiwan President’s Inaugural Address: Four Takeaways
Akhil Ajith
Chang’e 6 and China’s Lunar Exploration program
Femy Francis
Antony Blinken’s China Visit
Femy Francis
China in Mexico: What, How and Why
Akhil Ajith
Beijing Auto Show 2024: China’s global domination in EV sector
Akhil Ajith
Chinese cities are sinking below the sea level: Four Takeaways of a Science journal report
Femy Francis
Germany and China: It’s the economy, stupid
Femy Francis
Canada investigates Chinese interference in 2019 and 2020 elections
Devi Chandana M
Rise in China’s Marriages
Femy Francis
Ten years of BRI: Xi and the Beijing Summit
Femy Francis
The return of the South China Sea
Femy Francis
BRICS Summit poised as the Champion of Global South
Femy Francis
Japan-Australia's Reciprocal Access Agreement
Prerana P
The SCO Summit and the Delhi Declaration: The Focus on Digital Security and Iran’s Entry
CR Team | Avishka Ashok
China: Palestine Authority President Mahmoud Abbas’ visit emphasizes hope for statehood
Avishka Ashok | Research Associate | National Institute of Advanced Studies
20th Party Congress of the Communist Party of China: Major takaways
Devjyoti Saha
Solomon Islands’ China card: Three reasons why
Avishka Ashok
The Biden-Xi phone call and the underlying tensions in bilateral relations
Avishka Ashok
China’s two major interests in Kazakhstan: Energy and economyÂ
N Jayaram
China in 2021: A year of grandiose political changes and foreign affairs
Amit Gupta
China’s Economic Strategy: Global Strike vs. Globalization
Sukanya Bali
Alibaba then, Didi now: Three reasons why Beijing is going after its tech giants
Dincy Adlakha
The new three-child policy is two decades too late
Dincy Adlakha
Loud Echoes of the National Security Law in China
Keerthana Rajesh Nambiar
