NIAS Europe Monitor

NIAS Europe Monitor
Poland, EU and PolExit. It is complicated, for three reasons

Joeana Cera Matthews 
31 October 2021
Photo Source: EuroNews/Czarek Sokolowski/AP

Poland has to leave the bloc or stay within by adhering to the rules. Warsaw cannot 'have the cake and eat it too'.

On 12 October, a Polish Constitutional Tribunal ruling that declared the primacy of Polish law over the EU law came into force. Poland and the EU have had a long-standing feud over EU values. Against this backdrop, the highly-criticized Constitutional Tribunal passed the ruling that challenged the rule of law and the European Court of Justice (ECJ) supremacy. The questioning of the critical features of being an EU member has infuriated the bloc. 

Unlike Brexit, there will not be a Polexit. Three reasons why
First the geography. The UK, being an island, was already cut off from mainland Europe. Post-Brexit, the issue that persists is primarily regarding Northern Ireland remaining within the EU's single market. Every other issue was negotiated and dealt with during the mediation. Poland's exit is not going to be half as smooth. This is because, unlike the UK, Poland is very much a part of mainland Europe. Cutting off from the EU would inevitably imply losing all trade routes and depending on other means of importing goods. Trade would be severely affected. 

The Polish economy, if Polexit happens, is destined to fail. Even if Polexit happens, Poland will continue to be surrounded by countries that are still members of the bloc; this means extensive border checks and customs procedures for goods coming in and out of Poland. For the current Polish government, this crisis would create multidimensional problems. The economic crisis would lead to further humanitarian and socio-economic problems, which will all be too hard for Poland to contain and would only contribute to further chaos.

Second, the public opinion in Poland is against the exit. Unlike the British, the Poles do not back the exit; in UK, the idea had popular support prior to the exit as they voted in favor of leaving the bloc. As rumor mills began of an imminent Polexit, the Poles began to panic. Polish citizens repel the very thought of leaving the bloc. They intend to remain within, enjoying all the benefits of being an EU member. As staunch supporters of the EU, Poles are too accustomed to the benefits of being an EU insider. 

Third, an unpopular state opinion. Fortunately for the citizens, the Polish government is not keen on leaving the bloc either and has reiterated this on multiple occasions. Even Poland's Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki himself, assured that there would not be a scenario in which Poland was to leave the EU. He said: "We are here, we belong here and we are not going anywhere." Therefore, Polexit being a reality without the backing of the government is highly unlikely.

What about the EU on Polexit? Are there restrictions in Brussels?
The EU's retaliatory action to the Polish ruling has been complicated and prolonged. Sanctioning a member state is a significant move, and the bloc has delayed any action against Poland due to the more significant implications it holds. Nonetheless, the bloc has decided on 'concrete actions' if Poland' fails to bend' and revert the ruling. The first tool is a legal challenge to the ruling via triggering Article 7 of the EU treaty. Article 7 deprives member states of breaching the EU law of the 14 rights provided to them.

The second measure that the EU is expected to resort to is the 'rule of law conditionality' mechanism. This mechanism aims at providing increased transparency to the handling of the EU budget while promoting anti-corruption and judicial independence. Poland has, however, disagreed with the extended definition and stated that the mechanism does not concern Poland as corruption is not an issue faced by them. The EU has hit back at Warsaw, stating that the application of the mechanism according to their preferred definition would ultimately occur. They lack an independent judicial system, and such an absence, the EU claims, will result in corruption. 

The third tool is likely to hurt Poland the most. The EU believes that financially choking the Polish economy will ensure the ruling's withdrawal. The EU withholds Poland's pandemic recovery funds amounting to nearly EUR 24 billion. The failure to receive this money will impact Polish society more than it does the government. The lack of funds has already affected several provinces in such a severe manner that they have backtracked on their conservative ideologies to receive the EU funds. Several provinces were reported to have repealed their 'LGBT-ideology free zones' status, after the EU refused to forward the funds owing to their continued violation of the EU values. In its latest efforts, the EU ordered Poland to pay a daily fine of EUR 1 million in addition to the existing fine of EUR 500,000. Poland, however, refused to make any such payment. The EU, concerned about their money reaching the rebellious state of Poland, now requires it to convince the European Commission that the reconstruction funds, if provided, would be used following the EU laws. As a French MEP stated: "(the) Polish 'political choice comes with consequences attached.'" 

The EU's lack of practical mechanisms to punish Poland despite its values being risked has irked the bloc. The Tribunal questioned the legal order of the EU, causing legal and political uncertainty. It cannot remove or sanction its member without garnering widespread criticisms. Even if the EU can find a solution that favors their values dearly upheld, it would imply risking its agenda. Every major policy decision requires the bloc's unanimous vote; upsetting Poland will not help. An event wherein the EU budges on Poland's challenge is when the bloc will see its end – the supremacy of the rule of law is the bloc's foundation. Despite the MEPs' promise of 'not allowing commission values to be put at risk,' the union currently lacks a structure that would ensure this. Thus, the EU cannot afford to go into battle with one of its own. 

To conclude, Polexit is an unwinnable one for both parties. Poland has to leave the bloc or stay within by adhering to the rules. Warsaw cannot 'have the cake and eat it too'.


PREVIOUS COMMENTS

October 2026 | CWA # 2296

Lekshmi MK

The War in Ukraine:
Energy ceasefire, Strategic dilemmas, and an Uncertain halt
October 2026 | CWA # 2286

Preetha Renganarayanan

Students Protest in France:
Underfunded schools, Marginalised suburbs and an Increasing fiscal squeeze
September 2026 | CWA # 2269

Urja R Kudalkar

France and Syria:
What does President Macron's visit signal for Syria and the region?
August 2026 | CWA # 2239

Lekshmi MK

The War in Ukraine:
Continuing deep strikes, escalating civilian targeting, and expanding drone warfare
July 2026 | CWA # 2186

Lekshmi MK

NATO Summit 2026:
Four takeaways on Alliance unity, Defence commitments, and Support for Ukraine
July 2026 | CWA # 2181

Padmashree Anandhan

The War in Ukraine:
Deep strikes, NATO diplomacy and the Expanding air warfare
June 2026 | CWA # 2166

Ramya B

Russia (April-June 2026)
Unsuccessful Offensive, Drone Attacks and Economic Challenges
June 2026 | CWA # 2165

Himani Pant

Europe (April-June 2026)
End of the Orban Era, Political Fragmentation, Tightening of Migration Rules and Continuing Economic Slowdown
June 2026 | CWA # 2160

Radhika M Agarwal

The War in Ukraine:
Ukraine's Crimea Campaign, The Belarus Standoff, and Russia's Aerial Bombardment
June 2026 | CWA # 2154

Madhura Meenakshi Tanikella

The G7 Summit 2026
Four Takeaways on Economic security, Critical minerals, and Consensus on Ukraine and Iran
June 2026 | CWA # 2150

Madhura Meenakshi Tanikella

The War in Ukraine:
Massive drone attacks, Europe's support for Ukraine, and a Distant ceasefire
May 2026 | CWA # 2122

Radhika M Agarwal

The War in Ukraine:
Ballistic missiles, Nuclear drills with Belarus, and the Czech ammunition initiative
April 2026 | CWA # 2069

Padmashree Anandhan

The War in Ukraine
Expanding Drone Warfare, Russia's Strategic Patience and Ukraine's Diplomatic Outreach
April 2026 | CWA # 2063

Ramya B

Russia (Jan-Mar 2026)
Assertive Military Posture, Attempts for an Economic Turnaround and Search for Partners
April 2026 | CWA # 2062

Himani Pant

Europe (Jan-Mar 2026)
Trade diversification & FTAs, Increased defence spending, Tightening irregular migration and Economic slowdown
April 2026 | CWA # 2052

Shreya Upadhyay

The United States(Jan-Mar2026)
Tariffs, Ukraine, Iran and Operationalization of Trumps World Order
March 2026 | CWA # 2012

Padmashree Anandhan

The War in Ukraine
Long-range strikes, Defence adaptation and the EUs energy dependence
February 2026 | CWA # 1976

Lekshmi MK

The War in Ukraine
The Geneva Talks and Growing Negotiation Asymmetry
July 2025 | CWA # 1759

Padmashree Anandhan

July 2025 | CWA # 1744

Chittrothu Vaihali

EU-Canada Summit 2025
What is security and defence partnership all about?
July 2025 | CWA # 1739

Swati Sood 

Why now, what next?
June 2025 | CWA # 1735

Padmashree Anandhan

NATO Summit 2025:
Trump making Europe great again
June 2025 | CWA # 1701

Santhiya M

May 2025 | CWA # 1689

Padmashree Anandhan

Ukraine
October 2024 | CWA # 1522

Advik S Mohan

August 2024 | CWA # 1458

Samruddhi Pathak

August 2024 | CWA # 1457

Padmashree Anandhan

July 2024 | CWA # 1392

Ayan Datta

June 2024 | CWA # 1349

Padmashree Anandhan

May 2024 | CWA # 1311

Akhil Ajith

October 2023 | CWA # 1091

Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri

Issues for Europe
October 2023 | CWA # 1090

Yogeswari S

September 2023 | CWA # 1062

Feben Itty

September 2023 | CWA # 1061

Genesy B

September 2023 | CWA # 1060

Sreeja JS

July 2023 | CWA # 1022

Ankita Dutta

July 2023 | CWA # 1016

Medini Hegde

July 2023 | CWA # 1015

Ramya Balasubramanian

June 2023 | CWA # 974

Akshaya S

June 2023 | CWA # 968

Rishika Yadav and Nityashree RB

May 2023 | CWA # 952

Rishika Yadav

March 2023 | CWA # 931

Himani Pant

March 2023 | CWA # 927

Indrani Talukdar

November 2022 | CWA # 838

Rishma Banerjee

Tracing Europe's droughts
November 2022 | CWA # 836

Padmashree Anandhan

November 2022 | CWA # 833

Rishma Banerjee

October 2022 | CWA # 809

Padmashree Anandhan

July 2022 | CWA # 762

Padmashree Anandhan

February 2022 | CWA # 688

Padmashree Anandhan

February 2022 | CWA # 678

Ashwin Immanuel Dhanabalan 

October 2021 | CWA # 595

Joeana Cera Matthews 

October 2021 | CWA # 593

Harini Madhusudhan

September 2021 | CWA # 550

Joeana Cera Matthews 

August 2021 | CWA # 532

Sarthak Jain