The India–US interim trade framework
Tariff recalibration and Energy and Supply Chain realignment
The World This Week #342-343, Vol 8, No 04, 08 February 2026

R Preetha
8 February 2026
R Preetha is pursuing post-graduation in the Department of International Studies, Stella Maris College, Chennai, and is a Research Assistant at the National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru.
Photo Source: Reuters

What happened?
On 06 February, India and the US issued a joint statement announcing a framework for an Interim Agreement and their work towards a more comprehensive Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA).

On the same day, President Trump issued an executive order lifting the additional 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods after New Delhi committed to halting direct and indirect imports of Russian oil.  

What is the background?
First, a brief note on India–US trade relations. The bilateral trade relations have expanded over the past decade, despite recurring disputes over tariffs, market access, and regulatory standards. In 2024, India was the US’s 10th-largest goods trade partner, while the US was India’s largest. US goods exports to India stood at USD 41.5 billion and were concentrated in energy, manufacturing, and aerospace products. US imports from India were led by pharmaceuticals, manufactured goods, IT equipment, apparel, and textile furnishings. The US services exports to India were driven largely by travel, while imports were concentrated in business and IT services. Overall, bilateral goods and services trade totalled USD 212.3 billion in 2024, an increase of 8.3 per cent from 2023. Convergence, especially on supply chains and technology, increased, but the absence of a comprehensive trade agreement limited the scope of economic cooperation.

Second, Trump tariffs and the recent tensions. Following a 90-day pause on Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs, most Indian exports faced cumulative duties of 50 per cent, comprising a 25 per cent punitive tariff on Russian oil imports and a 25 per cent reciprocal tariff. These levies were the highest applied to any US trading partner and were reportedly among the lowest points in US–India relations in nearly 25 years. Despite announcements by Trump and Modi in February 2025 to negotiate, negotiations stalled as tariff tensions increased, with Trump repeatedly remarking on mediating the India–Pakistan conflict. In this backdrop, India pivoted to improving its engagement with China and struck a landmark trade deal with the European Union.

Third, negotiations and the interim trade framework. The framework announced on 6 February 2026 forms a key step towards the broader BTA negotiations launched in 2025. These talks have addressed long-standing and sensitive issues, including agriculture, pharmaceuticals, digital trade, non-tariff barriers, and industrial tariffs. Under the framework, the US reduced tariffs on most Indian exports to 18 per cent, while eliminating the additional 25 per cent duty tied to India's Russian oil purchases. In exchange, India agreed to eliminate or substantially reduce tariffs on all US industrial goods and to grant expanded market access for select US agricultural and food products, while protecting sensitive sectors such as agriculture and dairy. India is also committed to purchasing USD 500 billion worth of US goods over five years, across energy, aviation, precious metals, and advanced technology. Binding timelines were set for resolving non-tariff barriers, even as full BTA discussions continue in parallel. Though not a complete free trade agreement, this represents the most significant progress in India–US trade relations in over a decade.

What does it mean?
First, sectoral and bilateral trade implications. The tariff relief is expected to benefit Indian exporters in textiles, apparel, leather, footwear, chemicals, home décor, artisanal products, and selected machinery, improving competitiveness broadly in line with regional peers. Reduced duties on aircraft, aircraft parts, and quota access for auto components will help India’s integration into the US aerospace and automotive supply chains. For the US, India's tariff cuts on industrial goods, plus greater access for agricultural products, open new opportunities. Non-tariff barriers in agriculture, medical devices, and communications equipment are to be addressed within six months by accepting US or international standards. However, certain points remain in question, such as the outcomes for pharmaceuticals, which depend on US investigations. While the government highlights safeguards for vulnerable sectors, critics argue the framework was largely concluded on US terms, questioning the overall balance of concessions.

Second, implications for India–US relations. The interim framework reflects a stabilisation of bilateral ties after a period of acute tension over tariffs and disagreements on energy and market access. The rollback of the additional 25 per cent tariff has softened immediate friction; however, Washington retains an upper hand by monitoring India’s future energy sourcing. On the other hand, India withstanding broad agricultural opening and the protection of sensitive sectors highlight New Delhi’s emphasis on maintaining autonomy over sensitive areas. The framework showcases willingness on both sides and moves towards cooperation in areas of common interests such as supply chains, technology, and China.

PREVIOUS COMMENTS

February 2026 | CWA # 1959

Yesasvi Koganti | Yesasvi Koganti is an undergraduate student from Madras Christian College, Chennai.

UK and China
February 2026 | CWA # 1957

R Preetha | R Preetha is pursuing post-graduation in the Department of International Studies, Stella Maris College, Chennai, and is a Research Assistant at the National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru.

The India–US interim trade framework
February 2026 | CWA # 1956

Lekshmi MK | Lekshmi MK is pursuing post-graduation in the Department of Political Science, Madras Christian College, Chennai, and is a Research Assistant at the National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru.

End of the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START)
December 2025 | CWA # 1931

Padmashree Anandhan

NATO Summit 2025
December 2025 | CWA # 1924

Padmashree Anandhan

NATO Summit 2025
August 2025 | CWA # 1801

R Preetha

28 August 1963
August 2025 | CWA # 1780

Abhiruchi Chowdhury

Trump tariffs:
August 2025 | CWA # 1778

Lekshmi MK

28 July 1914
June 2025 | CWA # 1694

Aashish Ganeshan

The US:
May 2025 | CWA # 1689

Padmashree Anandhan

Ukraine
May 2025 | CWA # 1688

Ayan Datta

Gaza
May 2025 | CWA # 1675

Lekshmi MK

Turkey:
May 2025 | CWA # 1673

Padmashree Anandhan

Ukraine:
May 2025 | CWA # 1667

R Preetha and Brighty Ann Sarah

East Asia:
March 2024 | CWA # 1251

NIAS Africa Team

Africa This Week
February 2024 | CWA # 1226

NIAS Africa Team

Africa This Week
December 2023 | CWA # 1189

Hoimi Mukherjee | Hoimi Mukherjee is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Political Science in Bankura Zilla Saradamani Mahila Mahavidyapith.

Chile in 2023: Crises of Constitutionality
December 2023 | CWA # 1187

Aprajita Kashyap | Aprajita Kashyap is a faculty of Latin American Studies, School of International Studies at the Jawaharlal Nehru University New Delhi.

Haiti in 2023: The Humanitarian Crisis
December 2023 | CWA # 1185

Binod Khanal | Binod Khanal is a Doctoral candidate at the Centre for European Studies, School of International Studies, JNU, New Delhi.

The Baltic: Energy, Russia, NATO and China
December 2023 | CWA # 1183

Padmashree Anandhan | Padmashree Anandhan is a Research Associate at the School of Conflict and Security Studies, National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bangaluru.

Germany in 2023: Defence, Economy and Energy Triangle
December 2023 | CWA # 1178

​​​​​​​Ashok Alex Luke | Ashok Alex Luke is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Political Science at CMS College, Kottayam.

China and South Asia in 2023: Advantage Beijing?
December 2023 | CWA # 1177

Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri | Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri is a postgraduate student at the Department of Defence and Strategic Studies at the University of Madras, Chennai.

China and East Asia
October 2023 | CWA # 1091

Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri

Issues for Europe
July 2023 | CWA # 1012

Bibhu Prasad Routray

Myanmar continues to burn
December 2022 | CWA # 879

Padmashree Anandhan

The Ukraine War
November 2022 | CWA # 838

Rishma Banerjee

Tracing Europe's droughts
March 2022 | CWA # 705

NIAS Africa Team

In Focus: Libya
December 2021 | CWA # 630

GP Team

Europe in 2021
October 2021 | CWA # 588

Abigail Miriam Fernandez

TLP is back again
August 2021 | CWA # 528

STIR Team

Space Tourism
September 2019 | CWA # 162

Lakshman Chakravarthy N

5G: A Primer
December 2018 | CWA # 71

Mahesh Bhatta | Centre for South Asian Studies, Kathmandu

Nepal
December 2018 | CWA # 70

Nasima Khatoon | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

The Maldives
December 2018 | CWA # 69

Harini Madhusudan | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

India
December 2018 | CWA # 68

Sourina Bej | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

Bangladesh
December 2018 | CWA # 67

Seetha Lakshmi Dinesh Iyer | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

Afghanistan