Conflict Weekly Note

CWA # 1976
Conflict Weekly Note
The War in Ukraine
The Geneva Talks and Growing Negotiation Asymmetry
Conflict Weekly #319-320, 20 February 2026

Lekshmi MK
22 February 2026

Photo Source: AP

In the news
On 16 February, a third round of trilateral talks began in Geneva with Ukraine, Russia and the US. Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky stated that the talks are more about Ukrainian concessions than about Russian concessions. The Geneva talks follow two rounds of US-mediated talks in the United Arab Emirates, which were considered constructive but did not produce any significant breakthroughs.

On 17 February, Moscow said key issues, including territorial disputes, were discussed in the talks. Meanwhile, Russia carried out massive attacks on the energy infrastructures of Ukraine, and Ukraine conducted drone attacks on Russia's energy infrastructure.

On 18 February, President Zelensky described the peace talks in Geneva as “difficult,” accusing Russia of deliberately delaying progress toward a deal to end the war. He also criticised President Trump of exerting undue pressure on Kyiv to secure a resolution to the war. And he stated that it was “not fair” that Trump kept publicly calling on Ukraine, not Russia, to make concessions in negotiating terms for a peace plan. Russia's chief negotiator, Vladimir Medinsky, said that a new round of talks would be held soon. 

Issues at large
First, a brief note on peace talks so far. The Geneva meeting represents the third round of trilateral talks between Ukraine, Russia, and the United States. It follows two earlier US-mediated rounds in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, which were described as constructive but failed to yield breakthroughs. Despite repeated diplomatic engagement, core disagreements remain unresolved, including territorial control, security guarantees, and ceasefire terms. The continuation of hostilities alongside negotiations highlights limited trust and hardened positions. The repeated rounds indicate sustained diplomatic efforts. However, the absence of tangible outcomes underscores the difficulty of reaching a mutually acceptable settlement.

Second, the tussle over territorial sovereignty and annexation claims. Ukraine insists that its internationally recognised borders must remain intact and refuses to give up land seized during the war. However, Russia wants the occupied areas to be formally recognised as its own, citing security concerns, historical links, and the protection of Russian-speaking populations. For Ukraine, accepting annexation would mean losing sovereignty. For Russia, retaining control strengthens its political leverage. Because both sides see the territory as vital to national security, neither is willing to compromise.

Third, the differences over security guarantees to Ukraine. Ukraine wants strong security guarantees from its partners to deter future attacks and ensure its safety. These include military support, defence commitments, or long-term security arrangements. Russia opposes such guarantees. For Kyiv, guarantees are essential to avoid another invasion. However, for Moscow, limiting Ukraine’s security partnerships is a strategic priority. Thus, the disagreement is not only about ending the war but about shaping future security and deterrence in the region.

Fourth, an uneven negotiating environment for Ukraine and Trump’s asymmetric pressure on Kyiv. Ukraine feels greater pressure to compromise than Russia. Kyiv depends heavily on military and financial support from Western partners, which limits its bargaining flexibility. President Zelensky has indicated that proposals discussed in Geneva appear to demand more concessions from Ukraine than from Russia. By contrast, Russia faces fewer immediate external constraints. 

Fifth, continuing military strikes. Russia continues attacks to pressure Ukraine and weaken its infrastructure, especially energy systems. Ukraine conducts strikes to disrupt Russian logistics and demonstrate its resilience. Neither side fully trusts the other to honour a ceasefire, so neither reduces military pressure. By negotiating while continuing military operations, both attempt to secure better terms. 

In perspective
First, tough negotiations over territory. Reaching a settlement remains difficult because the territorial question lies at the heart of the conflict. Russia seeks recognition of territories under its control, while Ukraine refuses to concede sovereignty over internationally recognised borders. With both sides treating territory as central to national security and legitimacy, negotiations remain difficult and progress is limited.

Second, questions over Trump’s neutrality complicate mediation. Proposals linking security guarantees to territorial compromise create perceptions of bias in Kyiv. Pressure from President Trump to accelerate a settlement has further raised concerns about fairness and balance. 

Third, the war’s fourth year marks a prolongation without resolution. As the war enters its fourth year, the absence of a political settlement highlights not stability but deepening complexity. Continued fighting has hardened positions, expanded humanitarian and economic costs, and intensified energy and security vulnerabilities across the region. Prolongation has also widened geopolitical divisions and increased reliance on external actors. Instead of moving toward resolution, the war risks generating new security challenges and long-term instability. 

PREVIOUS COMMENTS

February 2026 | CWA # 1959

Yesasvi Koganti | Yesasvi Koganti is an undergraduate student from Madras Christian College, Chennai.

UK and China
February 2026 | CWA # 1957

R Preetha | R Preetha is pursuing post-graduation in the Department of International Studies, Stella Maris College, Chennai, and is a Research Assistant at the National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru.

The India–US interim trade framework
February 2026 | CWA # 1956

Lekshmi MK | Lekshmi MK is pursuing post-graduation in the Department of Political Science, Madras Christian College, Chennai, and is a Research Assistant at the National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru.

End of the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START)
State of Global Politics 2025
December 2025 | CWA # 1931

Padmashree Anandhan

NATO Summit 2025
State of Global Politics 2025
December 2025 | CWA # 1924

Padmashree Anandhan

NATO Summit 2025
This Week in History
August 2025 | CWA # 1801

R Preetha

28 August 1963
TWTW note
August 2025 | CWA # 1780

Abhiruchi Chowdhury

Trump tariffs:
This Week in History
August 2025 | CWA # 1778

Lekshmi MK

28 July 1914
TWTW Note
June 2025 | CWA # 1694

Aashish Ganeshan

The US:
CW Note
May 2025 | CWA # 1689

Padmashree Anandhan

Ukraine
CW Note
May 2025 | CWA # 1688

Ayan Datta

Gaza
CW Note
May 2025 | CWA # 1675

Lekshmi MK

Turkey:
CW Note
May 2025 | CWA # 1673

Padmashree Anandhan

Ukraine:
TWTW Note
May 2025 | CWA # 1667

R Preetha and Brighty Ann Sarah

East Asia:
NIAS Global Politics Database
March 2024 | CWA # 1251

NIAS Africa Team

Africa This Week
NIAS Global Politics Database
February 2024 | CWA # 1226

NIAS Africa Team

Africa This Week
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1189

Hoimi Mukherjee | Hoimi Mukherjee is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Political Science in Bankura Zilla Saradamani Mahila Mahavidyapith.

Chile in 2023: Crises of Constitutionality
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1187

Aprajita Kashyap | Aprajita Kashyap is a faculty of Latin American Studies, School of International Studies at the Jawaharlal Nehru University New Delhi.

Haiti in 2023: The Humanitarian Crisis
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1185

Binod Khanal | Binod Khanal is a Doctoral candidate at the Centre for European Studies, School of International Studies, JNU, New Delhi.

The Baltic: Energy, Russia, NATO and China
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1183

Padmashree Anandhan | Padmashree Anandhan is a Research Associate at the School of Conflict and Security Studies, National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bangaluru.

Germany in 2023: Defence, Economy and Energy Triangle
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1178

​​​​​​​Ashok Alex Luke | Ashok Alex Luke is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Political Science at CMS College, Kottayam.

China and South Asia in 2023: Advantage Beijing?
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1177

Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri | Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri is a postgraduate student at the Department of Defence and Strategic Studies at the University of Madras, Chennai.

China and East Asia
The War in Ukraine
October 2023 | CWA # 1091

Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri

Issues for Europe
IPRI Quarterly Forecasts I Triggers, Trends, and Trajectories
July 2023 | CWA # 1012

Bibhu Prasad Routray

Myanmar continues to burn
2022: The World This Year
December 2022 | CWA # 879

Padmashree Anandhan

The Ukraine War
Europe: Heatwaves, Wildfires, Droughts, and Ice Melt in Alps
November 2022 | CWA # 838

Rishma Banerjee

Tracing Europe's droughts
NIAS Africa Weekly
March 2022 | CWA # 705

NIAS Africa Team

In Focus: Libya
The World This Week: 150th Issue
December 2021 | CWA # 630

GP Team

Europe in 2021
Pakistan Reader
October 2021 | CWA # 588

Abigail Miriam Fernandez

TLP is back again
NIAS Fortnightly on Science, Technology & International Relations
August 2021 | CWA # 528

STIR Team

Space Tourism
Science, Technology and International Relations
September 2019 | CWA # 162

Lakshman Chakravarthy N

5G: A Primer
South Asia Monthly Brief (Nov 2018)
December 2018 | CWA # 71

Mahesh Bhatta | Centre for South Asian Studies, Kathmandu

Nepal
South Asia Monthly Brief (Nov 2018)
December 2018 | CWA # 70

Nasima Khatoon | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

The Maldives
South Asia Monthly Brief (Nov 2018)
December 2018 | CWA # 69

Harini Madhusudan | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

India
South Asia Monthly Brief (Nov 2018)
December 2018 | CWA # 68

Sourina Bej | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

Bangladesh
South Asia Monthly Brief (Nov 2018)
December 2018 | CWA # 67

Seetha Lakshmi Dinesh Iyer | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

Afghanistan