Photo Source: GIANLUIGI GUERCIA/Pool via REUTERS
National Institute of Advanced Studies (NIAS)
Indian Institute of Science Campus, Bangalore
For any further information or to subscribe to GP alerts send an email to subachandran@nias.res.in
The new unity of the BRICS-Countries
The US and the EU are lacking support in many developing and emerging economies
![]() |
Heribert Dieter
|
About the Author Prof Heribert Dieter is a Visiting Professor at the National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bangalore, India.
Western industrialized countries are losing important partner countries in the developing and emerging economies. Both the US and the countries of the EU are succeeding less and less in winning allies in international relations. Instead, the BRICS group, which includes the People's Republic of China and Russia, two of the most important adversaries of the West, has surprisingly gained in popularity. The group's recent summit in South Africa held in August saw the inclusion of Argentina, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. For the West, this is a warning signal. In the geopolitical conflict with Beijing and Moscow, the US and the EU depend on allies in Africa, Asia and Latin America. But why do numerous developing and emerging countries go their own ways and forego closing ranks with the US and the countries of the EU?
Lectures instead of cooperation between equal partners
An important point concerns the manner of Western foreign policy rhetoric. Since the war in Ukraine, the tone of Western foreign policy makers has become more aggravated. Western foreign policy makers now like to advocate their political positions in an absolute tone that does not allow for dissent. In Europe, too, the binary thinking familiar from American neoconservatives has now taken hold. The world is divided into good and evil.
Similar words were uttered by American and European politicians after Russia's invasion of Ukraine. In many countries in Asia, Africa and Latin America, however, it remains unforgotten that the US-led group attacked Iraq in 2003 without a mandate from the UN Security Council and based on fabricated circumstantial evidence.
A glance at the history of the first Cold War is enough to understand the futility of cautionary positions. Later US President and then-Senator John F Kennedy noted in 1957 in the New York Times that neither the US nor the USSR could decisively shape international relations in the Cold War. Neither country could continue to shape international politics unilaterally and ignore the perspectives of other nations-Kennedy named India, Japan, China, and a number of nonaligned states. Their thinking and perspectives, Kennedy said, would decisively influence the distribution of power in international relations.
It is by no means only small, insignificant countries that aspire to join the BRICS group. That aspiration is driven by discontent with the current world order. Candidates include Saudi Arabia, which for decades was one of the United States' staunchest allies in the Middle East. Indonesia, a country with the fourth-largest population after India, China and the US is one of the most important players in the Indo-Pacific region. It is surprising that Argentina and Thailand are not afraid to cooperate closely with China and Russia.
Vague goals
The second reason for the popularity of the BRICS group are the current financial policies of Western countries. The US, in particular, has never designed its financial policy with the consequences for developing and emerging countries in mind. After the financial crises in the US and Europe, central banks lowered interest rates to extremely low levels from 2008 onward, encouraging low valuations of their currencies. For a good year now, Western central banks have been focusing on fighting inflation and have once again caused fiscal turbulence.
The result of the self-serving policies of the US and other Western industrialized countries is that the search for alternatives to the American dollar has gained momentum. Apparently, many rulers in Asia, Africa and Latin America can well imagine themselves being hit by sanctions one day. Therefore, one of the economic policy goals of the BRICS group is to reduce the importance of the dollar for the settlement of trade in goods as well as for foreign exchange reserves.
Protectionism
The third reason for the declining popularity of Western countries is the current economic policy of the US and European countries, which is focused on partial self-sufficiency. The US is acting particularly brazenly. With the "Inflation Reduction Act," the US government is spending USD370 billion just to promote climate-friendly production.
The so-called friendshoring, in essence a preference for trading with economies that share the same political vision was propagated by US Secretary of State Janet Yellen, however, is a deplorable throwback to the autarchic striving of the 1930s. However, not only the US but also the countries of the EU have abandoned the previous form of international division of labour. But this departure from liberal trade policies is not only costly, it is also driving them into economic isolation. Poorer countries rightly view this departure from the previous liberal trade order with concern: The US and the EU are making access to their own markets more restrictive and are subsidizing individual industries with massive amounts.
The US and the countries of the EU, on the one hand, want to enter into geopolitical competition with communist China and authoritarian Russia and, on the other hand, behave as if the unipolar moment that began after the collapse of the USSR is still continuing. This will not work: The lack of acceptance of divergent perspectives of many African, Asian and Latin American countries benefits authoritarian China in particular. Beijing knows no supply chain laws in its foreign economic relations and acts less lecturing in foreign policy than Western countries.
References
1. George W. Bush, “Address to a Joint Session of Congress and the American People,” georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov, September 2001.
2. Chaguan, “The message to the global south,” The Economist, 08 July 2023, p. 14.
3. John F. Kennedy, “Sputnik has come, American complacency has gone.” The New York Times, 08 December 1957.
4. Michael Pettis, “The High Price of Dollar Dominance,” Foreign Affairs, 30 June 2023.
5. Mark Leonhard, “Governing in a Post-Western World,” Project Syndikate, 05 July 2023.
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmark |
Sneha Surendran
Wildfires in Europe: Another year of devastation
Padmashree Anandhan
Return of the Heatwaves
Indrani Talukdar
Ukraine War and the International Order
Himani Pant
Germany-Russia Relations: What Next?
Ramya Balasubramanian
Russia and Europe: Understanding Moscow’s strategies
Lakshmi Parimala
Hybrid Warfare in Ukraine
Padmashree Anandhan
The War in Ukraine: Four Issues to watch in 2023
Harini Madhusudan, Rishika Yada, Sneha Surendran, Prerana P, Sreeja JS and Padmashree Anandhan
Russia: Anatomy of Wagner Revolt, and its Fallouts
Rishika Yadav | Research Assistant, National Institute of Advanced Studies, Indian Institute of Science Campus, Bangalore
Serbia: Mass shootings, protests and instability
Rishika Yadav and Nityashree RB | Research Assistant and Research Intern, National Institute of Advanced Studies, Indian Institute of Science Campus, Bangalore
Turkey’s Elections: Unravelling the Political Spectacle of 2023
Padmashree Anandhan | Research Associate National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bangalore
Belgorod drone attacks: Who, What and Why?
Indrani Talukdar
Russia's Position in the Arctic: New challenges
Rishika Yadav
Turkey’s Election: Issues, Actors and Outcomes
Padmashree Anandhan
Pentagon document leak: Russia-Ukraine Conflict From a Tactical Lens
Indrani Talukdar
Belarus’s endgame in Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Padmashree Anandhan
Russia: Drone attacks escalate the Ukraine war
Padmashree Anandhan
The UK: Conservative party put to test as worker strikes continue
Harini Madhusudan, Rishma Banerjee, Padmashree Anandhan, Ashwin Immanuel Dhanabalan, and Avishka Ashok
What next for Russia, Ukraine, Europe, South Asia & India, and China
Padmashree Anandhan and Rishma Banerjee
UNGA 77: Who said what from Europe?
Rashmi Ramesh
Ice Melt in Alps in Europe: Three impacts
Rishma Banerjee
Tracing Europe's droughts
Padmashree Anandhan
Major causes behind Europe’s continuing heatwaves
Emmanuel Selva Royan
100 days of the Ukraine war: US Responses in the war
Padmashree Anandhan
100 days of the Ukraine war: What next for Europe?
Ashwin Immanuel Dhanabalan
100 days of the Ukraine war: More loss than gain for Russia
Angelin Archana | Assistant Professor, Women’s Christian College, Chennai
China's response to the Ukraine crisis: Shaped by its relationship with Russia and EU under the US Shadow
Shreya Upadhyay | Assistant Professor, Christ (Deemed to be University), Bangalore
Transatlantic Ties in the Wake of Ukraine-Russia War
Uma Purushothaman | Assistant Professor, Central University of Kerala, Kerala
Ukraine and beyond: The US Strategies towards Russia
Debangana Chatterjee | Assistant Professor, JAIN (Deemed-to-be University), Bangalore
Lessons from Ukraine War: Effectiveness of Sanctions
Himani Pant | Research Fellow, ICWA, Delhi
Ukraine and beyond: What next for Russia and Europe?
Sourina Bej
Elections in Sweden
Padmashree Anandhan
Italy's far-right wins 2022 elections
Padmashree Anandhan
Putin’s address in the Valdai Discussion: Six takeaways
Padmashree Anandhan
Queen Elizabeth: End of an era
Padmashree Anandhan
Russia and Eastern Economic Forum 2022: A sturdy Far East
Padmashree Anandhan
Who will be the next UK prime minister: Liss Truss v. Rishi Sunak
Padmashree Anandhan
France: Uber files leak, and Macron’s trouble
Emmanuel Selva Royan
Italy: Three factors about its current political instability
Padmashree Anandhan
What does Macron's victory mean for France and the EU
Rishma Banerjee
The rise of Marine Le Pen
Sourina Bej
Four challenges ahead for President Macron
Ashwin Immanuel Dhanabalan
Lecture report: Ukraine, Russia and Europe
Joeana Cera Matthews
Into History: Northern Ireland and Bloody Sunday, 50 years later
Padmashree Anandhan
Munich Security Report: Six takeaways
Joeana Cera Matthews
Europe and Africa: An elusive search for an equal partnership
Ashwin Immanuel Dhanabalan
Femicides in Europe: The case of France
Padmashree Anandhan
Post Brexit: Three challenges in Northern Ireland
Ashwin Immanuel Dhanabalan
Lithuania and China: Vilnius has become Beijing’s Achilles heel. Four reasons why
Angelin Archana
Russia in 2021: Expanding boundaries
Joeana Cera Matthews
In Europe, abortion rights are "a privilege." Four reasons why
Padmashree Anandhan
Mapping COVID-19 protests in Europe: Who and Why
Vaishnavi Iyer
France, Algeria, and the politics over an apology
Joeana Cera Matthews
NATO-Russia relationship: Looking beyond the suspensions and expulsions
Padmashree Anandhan
Facebook's Metaverse: Why it matters to Europe
Joeana Cera Matthews
Poland, EU and PolExit. It is complicated, for three reasons
Harini Madhusudhan
Europe's Energy Crisis and Gazprom
Chetna Vinay Bhora
Europe's Energy Crisis: It could get worse. Five reasons why
Sourina Bej
France: Paris Terror Trial
Harini Madhusudan
Belarus: Weaponization of the Migrant Crisis
Joeana Cera Matthews
From Crimea to Navalny: Putin's calibrated Europe strategy
Joeana Cera Matthews
Nord Stream-2: Why is the region unhappy about the pipeline?
Sarthak Jain
Nord Stream 2 is Russia’s geopolitical victory
Keerthana Rajesh Nambiar
The EU Summit 2021: Five Takeaways
Chetna Vinay Bhora